Warning: mysql_num_fields() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home4/terryf/public_html/deceptionbyomission.com/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 3096
Is the Pledge of Allegiance Truly a Conservative Act?

About terryf

terryf has been a member since December 30th 2012, and has created 172 posts from scratch.

terryf's Bio

Just an ordinary citizen with well over a decade of study devoted to uncovering the truth. It is out there. You just have to be willing to suspend your programming and look. Deception by omission is one way your mind is being controlled and control over your mind means control over your life. Your mind is meant to be like a parachute. It functions when it is open. Please open it.

terryf's Websites

This Author's Website is

terryf's Recent Articles

Is the Pledge of Allegiance Truly a Conservative Act?

After becoming an adult, I’ve always felt a bit uncomfortable about reciting the pledge of allegiance. As a school child, I never questioned it which I suppose is normal.

As I became an adult however, it kind of rankled me to place my hand on my heart and pledge allegiance to a government which I was recognizing more and more as an enemy not an aid.

Perhaps too, it may be because it smacks of the “love it or leave it” mentality of the narrow minded patriot with “my country right or wrong” principle as their philosophical backbone.

I guess what is more important to me, more than blind patriotism, is personal freedom supported by a questioning of the acts and motives of government. The pledge on the other hand smacks of blind allegiance to a State with deference to the political powers of the Federal government. Not something I feel comfortable with at all.

Nevertheless, once you do a little homework on the origins of the pledge, perhaps my uncomfortable feelings are justifiable.

What’s Conservative About the Pledge?

In a 2003 article from the Cato Institute, Gene Healy writes about the origins of the pledge and its meaning:

It’s probably too much to ask politicians to reflect a little before they lunge for a political hot-button issue. But any conservatives so inclined should think about what they’re defending. What’s so conservative about the Pledge? Very little, as it turns out.

From its inception, in 1892, the Pledge has been a slavish ritual of devotion to the state, wholly inappropriate for a free people. It was written by Francis Bellamy, a Christian Socialist pushed out of his post as a Baptist minister for delivering pulpit-pounding sermons on such topics as “Jesus the Socialist.” Bellamy was devoted to the ideas of his more-famous cousin Edward Bellamy, author of the 1888 utopian novel Looking Backward.

Looking Backward describes the future United States as a regimented worker’s paradise where everyone has equal incomes, and men are drafted into the country’s “industrial army” at the age of 21, serving in the jobs assigned them by the state. Bellamy’s novel was extremely popular, selling more copies than other any 19th century American novel except Uncle Tom’s Cabin.

Bellamy’s book inspired a movement of “Nationalist Clubs,” whose members campaigned for a government takeover of the economy. A few years before he wrote the Pledge of Allegiance, Francis Bellamy became a founding member of Boston’s first Nationalist Club.

Constitutionally Speaking

To my mind, those who claim to be conservatives should not genuflect unquestionably in obeisance to an idol of the State. Those who claim to be Constitutionalists (which has become another idol in its own way) recognize that the original intent of the Constitution was to give limited powers to the Federal government, as primarily outlined in Article 1, Section 8.

Even a careful reading of the so-called Supremacy clause in Article VI will reveal a limitation of Federal authority as follows:

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

Note carefully, “the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof“. The clear meaning is that only those laws made “in pursuance of” which is to say those which adhere to those permitted under this Constitution shall be supreme over those of the States.

A quick reference to the Bill of Rights affirms this interpretation when you read the 9th and 10th amendments:

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

These amendments make clear that the assignment of certain rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage all of the other rights held by the people and the States themselves.

The Pledge

The pledge eliminates these distinctions. One blindly pledging themselves to a flag representing the Federal government or the State makes no such divisions of Federal, State or the freedom of the individual. Instead, one blindly confirms his full allegiance to the State- right or wrong.

Can that truly be called a conservative principle? I suggest not.


Leftists are the ones who in actuality pledge their full allegiance to the nanny State, even if its one they wish to replace with another nanny State. They are the ones who wish to permit the State to have full authority over its citizens which includes all of its wealth and possessions.

Their pledge is that of the Marxist “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” which is to profess a full support for the legal plunder of the State of its citizens earned incomes and possessions.

As a Conservative and Christian, I find that attitude disturbing and reprehensible. Thou shalt not steal is a basic tenet of the Commandments as well as a guiding principle for societal order extending far back in recorded history including the earliest days of biblical Genesis. A person should be entitled to trade his time for income in a contractual agreement with an employer or in their own business and be able to retain their income as the fruits of their labor.

State Slavery

The income tax once openly recognized that principle. On your tax returns it once affirmed in writing, up to only about a decade ago, that the income tax was a voluntary act. That little deference to reality has been quietly removed as leftism has grown in power and scope, along with our Federal Leviathan. Now, we are expected to bow ourselves and advance as much of our incomes as the State deems necessary as a sacrifice on the altar of the governments (Federal, State and Local) without protest.

As a consequence of the growth of the State, more than half of our incomes are paid to one of the three levels of government making us little more than slaves of the State over half of our working hours. A slave is someone who, after all, works for free.

I work. I earn. I pay a large chunk of my earned income, the fruits of my labor, to one of the three governments not to mention another big chunk to the banks in the form of a mortgage. Leftists think this is permissible and acceptable. I do not. They label it whining. I call it blind obeisance and a theft of your personal power.

I believe a person should be entitled to voluntarily distribute their income and not have it removed through the coercion (hidden or visible) of a government which determines how my money should be spent. That is, on murder in the form of wars which have dragged on for over a decade with no end in sight or in the form of abortions of convenience which terminates a baby’s right to life for the assumed social benefit of a potential mother.

Back to the Pledge

So, if I profess to feel a bit uncomfortable pledging allegiance to an idol representing government gone wild, please forgive me. I value freedom above blind allegiance. My bad.

However, in the interest of the 1st and 9th amendments and with deference to my Christian God, I think I do have a valid point.

For leftists however, as demonstrated in Berkeley and now at other conservative speaking events, free speech is not a valued philosophy these days.

Consequently, they will probably not agree. Kind of makes the pledge a bit of hypocrisy though, now doesn’t it since our Republican form of government is based upon the Constitution and Bill of Rights including the first amendment right of speech?

Of course, hypocrisy seems to be a valued ideology of the left these days as well.

Ask Hillary and Barack, who are given a free pass on violations of law and liberty without question while we pursue an evidence-less demon called “the Russians” which Trump has been accused of courting to explain the Hillary defeat and the Democrats overall loss of seats in the general election by default as well.

This, of course, is pursued at taxpayer expense which is yet more theft and a waste of time and money by the State to which we supposedly pledge. Yet another reason to feel no guilt about supporting a “right or wrong” State.

Top 5 Reasons David C. Rockefeller Will Not Be Missed

This is an expansion inspired by an article found at this website.

Good article, but as I read it some thoughts came to mind about David C. and his family that were not covered in the article which I wanted to share.

To begin with watch this excerpt from an interview with late film maker Aaron Russo (Trading Secrets, The Rose and From Freedom to Fascism etc.) by Alex Jones which provides some key insights into the insidious nature of the Rockefeller family and the attitudes of the super rich about the majority of us:

BTW, these reasons have nothing to do with wealth envy. They are about the desire of David C. and his super wealthy elitist buds to control our lives, eliminating the useless eaters and enslaving the rest of us without shackles to serve their best interests while  sacrificing our freedoms.

The Top 5 Reasons (There are Others BTW)

1. Secret Societies Which Work Against the Interests of the Majority

He or his family was a Sole or Primary Founder of a Number of Key One World Government Tyranny Secret Societies like the Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group and Others.

These groups have continuously pushed their One World government New World Order through the media and government which includes a global banking system, global police and military force, global courts etc. etc. Take a look at the UN structure for a template of what these groups operating in the shadows have planned.

2. Population Control

– Listen to David himself and note how he wraps the UN into his solution as “playing an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population control and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations”

Some means of population control that the Rockefellers have funded and thus endorsed include: Eugenics aka as mercy killing, a candy coated term for enforced population control on selected (unwanted in their eyes) segments of society. The aged and infirm, the mentally ill, handicapped (mentally and physically) and other “useless eaters”.

Birth Control Through family planning (aka as abortions and other birth control methods) eventually leading through Margaret Sanger to Planned Parenthood. For a documentary that connects the dots of Rockefeller, Sanger and Planned Parenthood being used as a means of race and income based population control watch Maafa 21 below which provides the historical basis for this assertion (Best Copy on YouTube, Starts at 5:30)

3. Rockefeller Foundation was Instrumental in Funding Unethical Experiments on the Population Including Hitler’s Holocaust

Did you know there was a connection with I.G. Farben, the manufacturer of zyklon gas used to kill jews and other concentration camp prisoners? Maafa 21 covers it as well as the following article:  Company that provided Zyklon B for Nazi holocaust provided RU-486 for Abortion Holocaust

Additionally, from the article that stimulated this post see the following:

“Following up from Rockefeller’s own speech, we have the fact that the Rockefeller Institute was allegedly behind unethical experiments on the population. A few include infecting Guatemalans with STDs, sponsoring a plot by Dr. Cornelius P. Rhoads to infect Puerto Ricans with cancer, an allegation which Rhoads strongly denied and dismissed as a joke.
David Rockefeller joined the Rockefeller Institute board of trustees in 1940, was its chairman from 1950 to 1975, chaired the board’s executive committee from 1975 to 1995, and became honorary chairman and life trustee.”

4. Promotion of Global Tyranny Through One World Government

As noted in my previous post on Rockefeller’s death, David C. in his Memoirs autobiography was proud of his globalist, one world political and economic dreams.

This ties in with the inception of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which has its home in a location donated by the Rockefeller family. The CFR is a primary incubus of globalists who perpetuate the ideals of globalism and forward Rockefellers dream of a global government through quiet and total control of the whole world. Watch the following short clip which ties some of this elite influence and agenda together:

In addition, at the founding of the UN there were in attendance 18 members of the CFR including Alger Hiss who was behind the signing table as an honored guest. Hiss, one of the architects of the UN itself (along with Russian henchman Molotov), served as executive secretary of the Dumbarton Oaks Conference, which drew up plans for the future United Nations.

Alger Hiss, considered a Rockefeller man and a charter member of the CFR, was later accused as being a Communist spy and convicted of perjury for not admitting his consorting with known Communist Whitaker Chambers.

Rockefeller at first defended Hiss but later admitted in his Memoirs on page 151:

Hiss denied until the day of his death in 1996 that he was a Soviet spy, and his supporters continue to maintain his innocence. Once the evidence was all in, it appeared to me that he was a Soviet agent.

The United Nations ultimately is to serve as the template for a one world socialist state and is set up in the framework of a global government.

For more on the UN and its relationship to the Council on Foreign Relations and global government read The Shadows of Power by James Perloff or watch the following presentation by the author:

5. The One World Agenda Won’t Skip a Beat

Not only will he not be missed by the masses who have felt his sting in the form of draconian policies and the promotion of tyranny and even death as noted above, but he will not be missed by the elite who intend to enslave humankind under their control as well.

As pointed out by a major study from the Global Policy Forum the Rockefellers were a driving force in creating control over global health and agricultural policies.

Well, it seems that Bill Gates, for one, will be carrying the global governance torch onward, along with the CIA.

As pointed out in the aforementioned article:

The Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have specifically been working together in tandem to create means for depopulation through the use of vaccines. Check out the video below of Bill Gates talking about how this could be done.

Gates and Rockefeller are both confirmed Bilderberg attendees, and could have been collaborating together knowingly.

Additionally, the CIA and Rockefeller family also have a history working together, specifically in regards to the handling of classified information. Some have even described the CIA, which grew out of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) after WWII, as Rockefellers police.

So while most of us will not miss the presence of David C. Rockefeller, not a beat will be skipped in the plans for a global government under the tyranny of the UN and the self appointed elite.

The election of Donald Trump puts a fly in their ointment. It will not be a cure-all but it is a major inconvenience to have the President of the United States running around talking about America first which is a direct threat to their dream of a New World Order.

The opposition will be continuous, relentless and is well funded. Don’t expect David’s dream to die with him. It is alive and well in the hearts of many psychopaths entrenched in positions of power around the globe and in the United States. Hang on Dorothy, We ain’t in Kansas no more. We’re in for a rough ride and David’s death will not make it any smoother.

Champion of One World Government- David C. Rockefeller Dies at Age 101

The Honorary Chairman of the globalist, New World Order champion organization the Council on Foreign Relations has passed away, apparently in his sleep, of congestive heart failure. I don’t think we can pin this one on the Russians but some may try anyway, who knows?

Rockefeller was known to have made statements like this:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……

It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

The super national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. ― David Rockefeller

Obviously not a champion of national sovereignty or freedom from government for the common citizen. His dream was to run the planet through a hand picked number of elites who control virtually everything.

Bill and Hillary Mourn

Bill and Hillary Clinton mournfully eulogized that David Rockefeller was a “kind, good man” who used his fame and fortune to do good in the United States and abroad.

Really now? A man who championed the tyranny of a global government run by “an intellectual elite and world bankers” are the dreams of a “kind, good man”? Uh, I beg to differ but then I don’t promote a world view that says that it takes a village or the community to raise our children which is to say the State in reality. Nor any of the other criminal activities that the Clinton’s have engaged in during their less than ethical careers.

In a formal statement, the former president and first lady described Rockefeller as a “consummate businessman, great humanitarian and serious scholar”.

We celebrate a long life well-lived and send our gratitude and prayers to his family and all who supported him on his remarkable journey. Hillary and I are grateful for his friendship and his remarkable life.- Statement from President Clinton and Secretary Clinton on the Passing of David Rockefeller

They say his tremendous support of arts and humanities in America gave millions the opportunity to experience the country’s great heritage of painting, dance, music and more. Of course, they don’t mention that his support of these “humanities” promoted his globalist world view in one form or another.

They also fail to mention,  as did Rockefeller’s buds in the media, that Rockefeller dreamt for most of his long life of a new world order as a quote from his autobiography reveals:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. ― David Rockefeller- Memoirs

In short, the Clinton promotion amounts to little more than a cherry picked whitewash of just who and what this man represented. For a more realistic view, watch the YouTube or read the article linked to at the end of this article.

Talking about Collusion BTW

Interestingly, as noted in his autobiography, he credits the very same media which is so tenacious about hammering away at Donald Trump on the still unproven collusion with Russia- which they are attempting to claim was the cause of his defeat of a candidate that did not represent any real change in direction- with maintaining discretion on his world government goals.

Would that behavior count as collusion? I mean, discretion that covered up a direct assault on our Constitutional sovereignty. Well……apparently not. I guess that as long as the collusion identified fits the approved narrative, it’s OK.

It’s that unidentified, evidence-less collusion that does fit the narrative which really counts.

The Beat Goes On

As with all of us, life proceeds with or without us. For most of us, this man will not be missed. Even the entrenched globalists will not miss him as their mechanisms of global governance are already firmly planted such as the international central banking system which our Federal Reserve is a big part of.

David C. Rockefeller was not a champion of the people. He was instead a champion of the tyranny of a minority run elitist State over the right of the people to be free of the shackles of government dominating their lives.

It is not a dream that matches that of anyone who appreciates freedom of choice and protection of their individual rights.

For more on Rockefeller’s life and death without a Clinton-like whitewash click here.  Fact is, most of the mainstream media as they did during his life will paint him as humanist and ignore his stated global governance goal. The above article, from a source that recognizes his true colors, will not.

The Worst Part of Replacing Obamacare So Far- Replace

Why does every mention the elimination of Obamacare have to be immediately followed with the word “replace”?

The Part I Don’t Like About Repeal and Replace is Replace

I’m probably not far from the rest of those people who feel that our government is headed in the wrong direction when I suggest that they just repeal Obamacare and leave it at that for now.

Has any politician noted yet that a repeal is still going to leave us with a major healthcare marketplace problem and that is Medicare and Medicaid which are both already going broke? Plus, all the rest of the already existing regulatory control over the healthcare market that has helped to drive costs up to record levels year after year.

Fact is, the healthcare marketplace even before Obamacare was already very heavily regulated. Obamacare was simply the icing on the government control cake.

As the following commentary notes, Republicans already voted twice to repeal (replace NOT included) Why can’t they do that again?

Repeal the darn thing. Give it a time frame before the repeal kicks in. While you are at it allow for the greatest amount of competition in the market. Get out of the consumers way and allow them to choose without penalty.

Obamacare Lite- Four Ways It Fails

As Rand Paul has suggested, the Ryancare plan is nothing more than Obamacare lite.

1. It retains subsidies. Obamacare had subsidies for people to buy insurance. Ryancare keeps the subsidies under the label of refundable tax credits.

As Paul told Breitbart News:

Some people are predicting that it’s actually going to be more expensive than the subsidies we have under Obamacare. This isn’t you getting your own money back, this is you getting somebody else’s money.

So, a family that makes $30,000 a year could actually get $14,000 that they didn’t pay. Let’s say they paid zero in income tax, they could get $14,000 back.

One, we don’t have the money — it’s a new entitlement program.

And two, if you get $14,000 back do you think the insurance company is ever going to sell insurance for less than $14,000? That becomes the floor. So, it actually pushes insurance rates up — it doesn’t allow insurance rates to fall. So, that doesn’t allow insurance rates to fall and it sets up a new entitlement.

2. After a year, the Cadillac tax on better plans returns. That’s called penalizing success- a traditional liberal technique.

3. The individual mandate forcing you into the healthcare marketplace remains. Except you pay the insurance company instead of the government. Big whoop of a change huh? Another liberal technique, force people to act the way you want them by removing their freedom of choice through the coercive force of government.

4. Ryancare keeps insurance company subsidies allowing up to $100 million of reinsurance provided by public money. That is likely to go up over time once they get that foot in the door btw.

Essentially, the most egregious aspects of Obamacare remain with just a few label changes and redirection. The public meanwhile continues to lose their freedom of choice and nothing is really done to allow for a free market to operate in the healthcare marketplace.

What’s Missing From the Discussion?

The part never discussed by any politician including President Trump as well, is a discussion on whether the Federal government has any place at all, from a Constitutional perspective, in the healthcare marketplace.

It should, with an informed public, be needless to say but isn’t because the public is not well-informed as a whole but…..there really is no Constitutional authority for the Federal government to meddle in a free market which healthcare actually is or should be anyway.

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, there is nothing more permanent than a government program. Once they get a foot in the door, it nearly impossible to get them out of where they never belonged in the first place.

Now, we all are expected to simply assume that we need government to run our healthcare system. We can’t be trusted to spend our earned income wisely in a free market. How could we possibly be that intelligent? Now we all need Nanny Government to make our decisions for us within their pre-determined limits, enforced by law of course.

Rand Paul’s Offering

While it’s not perfect (nothing ever will be) its way more free market than the Ryancare plan. Rand Paul’s plan suggests that we:

• legalize inexpensive insurance plans (Students used to be able to purchase cheap insurance plans. Not since Obamacare.)

• remove many of the regulations currently restricting the use of Health Savings Accounts (HSA);

• allow individuals to deduct the cost of their health insurance from their income and payroll taxes;

• expand Association Health Plans (AHPs) to allow small business owners and individuals to band together across state lines through their membership in a trade or professional association to purchase health coverage for their families and employees at a lower cost;

• increase access to health coverage by creating an interstate market for health insurance that allows insurers licensed to sell policies in one state to offer them to residents of any other state;

• provide states new flexibilities for Medicaid waivers for innovative state plan designs;

• allow non-economically aligned physicians to negotiate for higher quality healthcare for their patients; and

• allow physicians to deduct a portion of the costs incurred from uncompensated care.

You’d think Republicans would be embracing these suggestions since they promote more free market considerations. They aren’t for the most part.

A disturbing trend and not what the public voted for when they elected Donald Trump. They better get their, you know what together or they will end up out of office. Let’s hope they listen to Rand Paul and the Freedom Caucus suggestions or the Trump election is going to a very disappointing and failed experiment.

A Current Example of How Fake News is Created- Deception by Omission

Moveon.org is a Soros funded (Tides Foundations and Open Society) and leftist funded organization.  Soros funded $6.2 million to MoveOn in a 6 month period in 2003 alone.

Naturally, MoveOn heavily endorsed and supported Obama. MoveOn dispatched approximately a million volunteers to work on his 2008 campaign nationwide. All told MoveOn and its members contributed $58 million directly to the 2008 Obama campaign alone and raised another $30 million to other 2008 Democrat campaigns.

Of course, MoveOn is a natural enemy of Donald Trump, as is Soros and any of the organizations he helps to fund like Black Lives Matter and Resist Facism.

How Organizations Like MoveOn Create Fake News

The following clip being distributed by MoveOn is a quick illustration of how fake news is created. It is very instructive and clearly demonstrates how propaganda is created.

Listen carefully to what Donald Trump says at the beginning of his 44 second clip. Then, note how the Congressman transforms it by specifically placing words in Trumps mouth. Words Trump never issued:

The Construction of the Straw Man

As you may know, a straw man is a false construction in an argument. It is labeled such because like a straw man, it is easy to knock over.

In the clip above, the fake news was the straw man created by the Congressman who lied about what Trump actually said when he led off with “The media is the enemy of the people.”

Fact is, Donald Trump never said that. Listen for yourself. It is even in the letter box of the clip below the video.

Trump specifically stated- “fake news“. He also never used the words media or even news by themselves. They were used in context with other words which like all context gives words their full meanings and intentions.

More significantly, MoveOn cut the Trump clip to eliminate what he followed this initial statement up with in his CPAC speech, which you can listen to in full with a little effort.

Specifically, Trump went on to further emphasize how the media purposely eliminated the word “fake” from his statement as follows:

“We are all fighting the fake news. It’s phony, fake. A few days ago I called the fake news media the enemy of the people, and they are… They’re very dishonest people.”

He then stressed that he was calling the “fake news” outlets the enemy, not the media in general. “So I’m not against the media. I’m not against the press. I don’t mind bad stories if I deserve them. I love good stories… But I am only against the fake news media or press. Fake. They have to leave that word,” he insisted.

The follow up was purposely eliminated by MoveOn because it doesn’t fit their Anti-Trump narrative. This is propaganda in the making right before your eyes.

Done so poorly in fact that even a thinking child could see through it with a minimum of coaching.

Fake News- Deception by Omission Plus

This is what fake news really is. This is how they create it.

In addition to the direct substitution of the words spoken, we also have Deception by Omission. The remainder of the speech which contains the whole point of the first statement is eliminated. You never get the full context. You only are fed the part that MoveOn wants to use to discredit Donald Trump. Intentional deception by omission.

What a Set Up

The Congressman erects a fake news straw man. Then, the Congressman responds to the fake news as though it were real making him look like a hero of the people while posing Donald Trump as an enemy of the people. Lies and distortions. Truly propaganda designed as deception by the media, MoveOn and the Democratic Congressman- Jerry Nadler.

So, is the real enemy of the people- Donald Trump? I don’t think so.

This example simply provides us with more reasons to mistrust Soros funded organizations and Democratic Congressman like Nadler.

The Real Enemy

It’s true “fake news” (AKA propaganda) is the enemy of the people.

More accurately, it is the people who create the fake news who are the real enemies of the people like this Congressman Nadler and MoveOn- yet another organization funded by the atheist Communist sympathizer- George Soros.

However, the real enemy of the people are the ones who pose as a saviors like Georgie boy. Without the money of deceivers like Soros and his ilk, organizations like MoveOn would die on the vine.

Now, you know how fake news is created and why. Find and share your own examples.

Remember, when you shine a light on cockroaches they scatter. So please, above all- keep the light on them. Makes us all safer.