Warning: mysql_num_fields() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home4/terryf/public_html/deceptionbyomission.com/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 3096

Techniques of Deception and 911

Once Upon a Time a Group of Elitists Had a Dream…

Suppose you were among a group of self-appointed elitists who fashioned themselves as Gods or intellectual superiors among the people. You believed that you had the inside track to what was needed to bring about a semblance of harmony amongst the generally ignorant and undisciplined masses.

Now, you had determined that what was necessary was a global governing body which you and your ilk, of necessity, would have to be the controlling force. In order to implement such a plan however, what was needed was a global governing body.

So, you constructed the framework of such a body (Think the UN here.)

Nonetheless, you also needed to gain control through the cooperation of the masses of each existing nation. This would be best done agreeably through stealth, rather than through the more easily detectable use of coercive force.

The best case scenario would be to generate a means of getting the people to actually request the implementation of your globally instituted government (or a New World Order as the political elite like to refer to it). This could happen by getting them to believe that it was their idea. As a whole, they would most agreeably accept the controls of the global government if they thought that it not only was their idea but also was in their best interests and for their personal protection and safety.

Wellllll.....maybe not "nothing but the whole truth."

Wellllll…..maybe not “nothing but the whole truth.”

So, how could you possibly achieve such a lofty goal?

One Effective Technique…

Attack innocent civilians. Come again- innocent civilians?

OK, stay with me here. Yes, innocents. That is, people including women and even children. Most especially, ordinary people. People far removed from any political game or awareness of it. Just your normal everyday, unsuspecting citizen.

But……..Why innocent civilians?

Well, the reason for using this technique is actually psychologically sound from the perspective of the average psychopathic (without conscience) elitist focused only on their end game goals.

Innocents, especially those not politically astute, could easily be led (once aroused and fearful) to turn to the State to implement greater security. Even, in fact, if it meant that they were required to sacrifice and limit their own freedoms to make it happen.

This could work particularly well if if the people were either already disarmed or somewhat controlled and limited in providing their own self-protection. That is, they were already conditioned to blame weapons for violence instead of the bearer of the weapon. This would make them less inclined to carry personal protection and accept restriction. (Or afraid to carry for fear of being detected and arrested or charged for doing so.)

May I suggest that this is the manipulative logic that lies behind mass violence that has specious (having a false look of truth or genuineness) causes? I am suggesting that BTW.

Scapegoat- A Necessity

Now, this could not be pulled off by a controlling group within its own kind, if there were an opportunity for detection. You would of necessity need to use stealth. You would also need to have an acceptable scapegoat to pin the blame upon, already frameable and set up to take the fall. (A “patsy” as Lee Harvey put it before being eliminated by Jack Ruby.)

After all, our own rulers could never in any way be suspected of allowing or facilitating a devastating event which impacted its own innocent civilians and continue to maintain the public trust. It would have to be precipitated by some external group of radicals far removed from this nation or some “nut” outside of the mainstream of society, of course.

Let’s Consider an Event Like 911 in This Model?

Ok, now suppose you wanted to implement your New World Order. As previously noted, cooperation of the people would be an easier way to make it happen and more effective in the long run than the obvious use of force.

Generating fear of personal safety would be one very effective technique to accomplish your mission. As mentioned, if it involved the murder of innocents, you would necessarily have to be totally free of blame. Otherwise, your real intended plan to further the New World Order could not be facilitated after the precipitating event took place.

Any hint of an association like this, especially when the event were fresh, would immediately turn the people you wished to enslave upon you! This certainly would not be helpful to your long range plans. The jig would be up as the saying goes.

However, suppose you were able to very quickly pin the deed on a scapegoat? Deflect attention from it being an “inside job”and focus the public eye on outsiders. This would be especially effective if the scapegoat(s) were a group or person(s) that included a built in “confirmation bias” (That is , people’s inclination to accept information that supports what they already believe.) This technique would additionally be particularly effective if the confirmation bias belief were soundly entrenched and negatively emotionally charged.

911 and the Scapegoat Model

Let’s examine 911 with this context in mind. First of all, if American’s suspected 911 involved some group from their own nation, they would get very angry. That it was in any way an inside job, they would likely turn on their government rather than support it and demand justice from it. Perhaps even resorting to violence themselves complicating rather than facilitating the end goal.

This would not do if the overall goal were to have them align with you in granting cooperation to implement enslavement of them. Just like the Lost Boys in Pinocchio, you would need to distract and engage them in their own enslavement. You certainly could not pull that off if they saw through the charade.

LiesFortunately for the elite controlling the media narrative, there exists another group which could very easily be targeted to pin the blame on. One that most Americans would accept as violent sorts who have no respect for freedom or Christian morality. Can you guess who that would be? I think I can safely conclude that most of us would agree that the label of radical Muslim could be acceptably inserted as the answer here.

Let me be clear that I do not intend to protect or shield Islamic teachings from their violent nature. They do teach and implement violence seen in the media as beheadings, suicide bombings, abuse against their own woman, attacks and even murder directed against Christians, against other sects they despise etc. I am simply suggesting that they, by their aggressive tendencies and inclination towards violence, they make awfully good scapegoat targets in this strategy.

On the other hand, suppose instead someone suggested that our assumed guardians of freedom, our government or individuals within our system with the ability to orchestrate a government cover up, were the perpetrators of an event like 911? Particularly after continual, immediate media suggestions implicating Bin Laden coupled with endless television loops of the buildings collapsing.

Would you think that an accusation like this would fly? Ask yourself honestly, which of the two suggestions above were you inclined to immediately accept in the aftermath of 911?

Would you be more inclined, with the built-in confirmation bias, to accept a proposed scenario involving radical Muslim terrorists or the possibility of an inside job, particularly in the immediate wake of the event. Which sounded more believable? Again, I think the answer to those questions is pretty transparent by now as well.

After the Event

Perhaps, however, what actually transpired for the average citizen after the event could give us an honest perception of the real primary intended target of 911.

For example, what happened to airport security?  The groping began. Another few specious events like the alleged water bottle bombing and the shoe bomber and well…..even more controls. All for our own protection and good of course.

Now, we all became criminals until we are proven innocent by either being groped or X-rayed, having our luggage examined with potentially lethal substances like shampoo containers over 6 oz. confiscated even.

Heck, I had about $40 of new, high quality, personal care products absconded because they exceeded the arbitrary oz. limits the first time I traveled after the new regulations were implemented. (I do suppose however that natural shave cream could easily be construed as a dangerous packaging for the organic terrorist. Although I imagined the NSA employee enjoying a high quality shampoo that evening instead. I was so ticked that I wrote my Congressman. Much to my surprise, he never responded. Not very patriotic of me I guess.)

The Patriot Act, was quickly generated and approved, almost as though this Act were just sitting on a shelf just waiting for the right time to be implemented. Among other intrusions like NSA spying which was exacerbated, this Act gave the government the capability of examining your bank account without you even needing to be informed by the bank, along with other State authority strengthening measures.

But hey, the term Patriot attached to the Act did give it a nice ring though. I mean, what true “Patriot” wouldn’t sacrifice their personal privacy and their 6th amendment right of privacy- “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…..” for the good of the nation and their personal security, right?

Domestic Spying by the NSA as already noted was also ramped up, as the whistle blower Mr. Snowden pointed out most recently.

Wars on terror were immediately launched against the assumed offending nations even before the corroborating evidence was collected and confirmed. Not against terrorists per se but rather against the entire nation of the assumed offenders requiring complete occupation and all out war.

Note that 15 of the accused 19 were from Saudi Arabia, the rest from Arab Emirates, Egypt and Lebanon but we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan instead. Anyone in the mainstream media ever mention that discrepancy I wonder? Of course, it did also put a few coins in the pockets of the international financiers and continues to do. It also continues to serve as a convenient means of preserving and generating further controls on the population by keeping the flames of fear burning.

Saddam was accused of storing significant quantities of WMD’s an accusation that was never proven. The aggressive investigation yielded NO evidence after 18 months was quietly abandoned. Curiously, there was hardly a murmur in the media, in contrast to the incessant drum beat leading up to the Iraq war which was loud and repetitive. While Iraq made the front pages daily, the WMD investigation termination was in the back pagesonce! (Oh and once again note that Iraq did not provide an of the accused terrorists. Why didn’t we invade the nations they actually came from if it was a “war against terror” and the nations providing the terrorists?)

Still Today…

The war on terror continues to be a reason to restrict our freedoms of movement and privacy. We still spend a lot of money on the war on terror, fueling inflation with debt but feeding the parasite banksters likely connected to 911 I speculate. (What else can you do when the executioner’s face is always well hidden as Dylan put it, but speculate on the evidence?)

Fear mongering continues to be a technique associated with any disturbing event. The suggestions for solutions nearly always point to further restrictions on our basic freedoms, always appointing more government authority as the solution.

So, with all of the above in mind, I invite you to objectively (which means disengaging negative emotion and fixed opinion) watch either of the 2 YouTube videos below.

Take a fresh look at 911. See if it still makes sense to you as spun by the media and government or NIST. Perhaps some of the suggested motives above may have more meaning afterwards. At the least, I think you will learn a thing or two about the implementation of government and insider deception (It’s global btw not just confined to America.):

The first video Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth presentation takes a look at the events from the point of view of construction engineers and other professionals who plan and construct high rise buildings, along with other 911 related professions which would lend themselves to contributing to an investigation of the events:

The second one September 11- The New Pearl Harbor (full) demonstrates the parallels between 911 and Pearl Harbor and most especially addresses the conspiracy “debunkers” (from France and Italy not just the U.S.) claims in the light of the actual evidence. It is confessedly a bit long but taken in chunks if you prefer is worth the watch and will give you another view of 911 you will not get from the mainstream media in a sensible and non-hypey manner:

Give them a view. Make your own mind up based on the currently available evidence. 911 needs a second look.

NIST was a joke with ludicrous conclusions, as was the 911 commission. A second look will never happen from those in authority, just like the questions surrounding JFK which still remain satisfactorily unanswered for many of us.

The pancake collapse (despite the smoking gun anomaly of Building #7) from terrorist piloted airliners is their story. They are sticking to it. You can count on that. The real back story? Not a chance. You can count on that as well.

The Truth About Santa- Beyond the History Channel

At this time of the year, the figure of Santa Claus is ubiquitous and an accepted American symbol of the Christmas season. In America, a Christmas without Santa just isn’t Christmas.Santa with Pack

Children highly anticipate Santa’s arrival eagerly hoping they get what they asked for. Parents on the other hand take careful steps not to let them know that the real gift giver is them and not Santa. They are convinced to accept this role by societal conditioning and media propaganda including a constant drone of children’s Christmas programming which increases in crescendo as Christmas day approaches.

After all, it is just an innocent fantasy and fun for the children. But is it?

The Real Story of Christmas?

The History Channel runs a show each year at this time called The Real Story of Christmas. You can watch it online here. It is interesting but there are some built in biases and background left out that would be good to know.

For example, in the “real” story we are told that “the Church” declared the feast day of the nativity  on the same day as the birthday of the sun god Mithra. They fail to mention that “the Church” is actually the Roman Catholic church. This ties in to some of the mythology built into the Santa image.

As any bible believing Christian and many Protestant church members know, the Catholic Church and religion is very different from Protestant denominations. In fact, it can hardly be considered biblical. Most Catholics do not even read the bible to be honest (I was raised as a Catholic BTW and attended parochial school for the first 6 years of my education.)

The Other Churches

The Protestant movement arose once the invention of the printing press made bibles more available. Formerly, they were mainly in Latin only and closely held by the Catholic church. Few people actually read them. This gave the Catholic church free reign upon interpretation of what is acceptable “Christian” behavior.

Once believers starting reading the bible themselves, however, they began to realize how off the Catholic church actually was and rejected/protested the church’s teachings. Hence, the rise of Protestant denominations and churches.

How Catholicism Arose

The Roman Catholic church itself developed as a response to the growth of true Christianity based on Christ’s teachings from apostles like Paul. Despite the fact that the Romans were doing their best to eliminate Christians, perceived as a threat to the empire, the group continued to grow. So Rome adopted another tactic and created their own State religion- The Roman Catholic church.

Note the Similarity to the Papal Hat (bottom right) and the stone Babylonian Dagon on the left? A Giveway or Tell, as They Say in Poker?

To appease and attract existing pagan religions, the Catholic Church was created as a hybrid of Christianity and paganism. You can note this in the pagan symbolism found throughout the religion. For example, one of the most common papal hats is markedly similar to that of the Babylonian god Dagon, a fish related, fertility god. (For more on pagan symbolism and the Catholic church on YouTube click here.)

I don’t want to go into detail in this post and take up too much space. I simply wish to point out that like a lot of the mainstream media facts presented as facts, they are often half-truths (deception by omission).

The “Church” as the History Channel decides to put it does not represent all churches. In fact, if you conducted an objective and careful study Catholicism, it does not even really qualify as Christianity if it were based on the foundation of Christian beliefs, the bible.

Again, this post is about Santa Claus not Catholicism so I will not go into too much detail here. I just mention it as a way that the History Channel spins their yarn about the “Real” Story of Christmas inaccurately.

So Where Did This Santa Claus Character Come From Anyway?

It is commonly accepted the Santa Claus morphed out of St. Nicholas, the Greek bishop of Myra. (Twas the Night Before Christmas poem for reference). He was known as a defender of Christianity, which is not very Santa like. However, he was also commonly linked to Odin, the ruler of Asgard, a major Germanic god which added some Santa as we know and love him traits to this personality.

Odin

Odin the Wanderer- 1896 Version

Odin, flew around the heavens at the time of the winter solstice (known as Yule) and was depicted as a white bearded man with magical powers. He rode an 8 legged horse (Sleipnir) who could leap great distances (like reindeer). Odin was feared because his judgements would determine prosperity or death in the coming year. Children would leave their boots by the chimney filled with carrots and hay for Sleipnir. Odin would leave sweets and fruits in return for the children.

Another winter connection from Germanic legend is Frau Holda, the Germanic goddess of winter. In German folk legends, she is depicted as a beautiful blonde who is the protector of children’s Santa on His Sleighsouls. Like Odin, she would fly through the night and give gifts to children, as Beliefnet.com noted. In some depictions, Holda is dressed in red and uses chimneys to deliver gifts. Some Germanic traditions involve leaving food and milk for Holda Dec. 24, known as Mother Night.

Now you can see the Santa Claus legend beginning to round out: passing judgment on life and prosperity, flying about with a magical leaping horse, giving gifts to children, going down chimneys, getting bribes to appease him/her like food and milk, coming at the winter solstice (around December 25th) etc.

What is Santa Claus Today?

Here’s the truth about what Santa has become to us today. Yes, he has all of the characteristics of the pagan gods above but he has now morphed beyond having those characteristics.  Christmas is tangentially now, at best, a celebration of the birth of Christ (Christ’s Mass right?). Christ is secondary to gift giving and getting now which is the cultural and commercial priority.

Christmas as we all know has become a consumer holiday now with nothing related to Christ these days. Hardly a time of spiritual celebration but rather of materialism. Heck commercial oriented entities even use an X in front of the “mas” to pretty much tell you what some intend to do with the Christ connection to this holiday.

The words of the song- Santa Claus is Coming to Town tell more:

He’s making a list
And checking it twice
Gonna find out Who’s naughty and nice
Santa Claus is coming to town

He sees you when you’re sleeping
He knows when you’re awake
He knows if you’ve been bad or good
So be good for goodness sake!

Like the God of the Bible (and Odin) Santa is judging us on his moral standards. He will also punish us or reward us like a supernatural being, not our parents.

Like the God of the Bible, Santa is all-knowing and observes everything. (Also like the Elf on the Shelf that I covered in another post.) However, you aren’t good to meet God’s standards, you are “good for goodness sake”. No biblical standards or commandments to live up to simply a nebulous and arbitrary “goodness” to be good for.

What’s the real truth about Santa then?

He’s the secular replacement for the Christian God of the bible. Secular meaning not connected with anything spiritual or religious. According to Psychology Today, “To be secular is to maintain a naturalistic worldview in which belief in anything is always proportioned to the evidence available.”

There is a big problem however with that interpretation however. The naturalistic worldview is the basis of the evolutionist. The problem is, when you actually take the evolutionary model and analyze its assumptions, one finds paltry evidence at best to support its claims. I can flesh this out, but let me just say this for now: it takes way more faith to accept the evolutionary model based on the evidence available than to believe in a Creator God.

The War Behind the War

Now, you may not have noticed with all of the distractions provided by our “electronic age”, but there is a war going on. That war is a war behind the wars, which is to say, a war to enslave and control humanity. A new world order (Please watch this BTW) if I may.

One of the major battles of this war involves jettisoning a personal God and replacing this with the God of the State (The Marx Model) and the Godless evolutionary model.

Guess what? Jolly Old St. Nick is a weapon in this war. Sad that one of our most cherished figures for children is just that but unfortunately all too true. After all, take a look at how he impacts parents and then read the Communist Manifesto’s intention on what should happen to the family. I think you’ll see how Jolly Old St. Nick aids that cause.

Santa places parents in a compromising position. By accepting your role in the Santa mythology, you are allowing yourselves to be participants in a lie. (BTW, I am not casting blame here. I admit that I got sucked into this as well when I had children.  It is very easy to buy into this agenda. I share this to seed you with a new awareness. One that I regret I did not have when raising my children.)

When your children discover this lie, how do you think it makes them feel about the integrity of their parents? Could this be a contributing factor as to why our children do not listen to us when they get older?

With parents compromised as the authority, are these children not now open to having a new authority stand in its place- like the State perhaps? Does this not also help to undermine the family unit as Marx and Engels wrote about in the Communist Manifesto as I noted above?

Suggestions for Parents About Santa

I don’t want to come off as Ebenezer Scrooge in A Christmas Carol here. I will be sharing gifts with my now adult children this year too. However, may I suggest that we be honest with our children for starters? If you participate in this deception, you place yourself as a parent in a position of compromise.

Do you fancy your children (or children to be) as morons? Who ends up with egg on their face when they discover the truth about Santa for themselves as you KNOW they will? Is this really the position you want to place yourself in with your children? Wouldn’t you rather teach them to be truthful, to trust your judgement and moral integrity instead?

Let Me Suggest Another Tack

Tell your children the truth about Santa. When they see him, let them know he is simply a person dressed up in a red suit. When they see him again in another store (you know they will), reinforce your truth, “Oh, look there’s another man dressed up in a red suit.”

Explain to them what Christmas is really supposed to be about, the birth of Christ or Christ’s mass as the derivation goes. (Remember, if you are truly a Christian you are in this world but not “of ” it. Reflect on what that really means.)

Santa with Crying ChildrenSanta’s actually a bit intimidating to a small child. They usually don’t like him and his big white beard when they first meet him. We often have to convince them to like this character.

Gift giving doesn’t all have to be from Santa you know. After all, was not the birth of Jesus celebrated by the wise men with gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh? Gift giving can beWise Men and Jesus Birth celebrated related to the baby Jesus if you wish, not the Santa Claus deception. Hence, you don’t have to give that part of the holiday up. You can probably also relate other decorative aspects to the Christmas story as well with some thought and imagination.

The point is giving up Santa (which they will give up at some point in time anyway) does not have to mean giving up Christmas. A Christian oriented celebration of the season can be a really enriching experience of this season, not a cultural deprivation but a cultural enrichment. (Really now, how enriching is it to run around depleting your wallet anyway?)

Just remember what really is at stake here– your integrity as a parent in the eyes of your children. I encourage you to step outside the box on this one.

I know how our present media driven culture is stacked against you. Commercial entities have made their stake in the game clear by replacing the name of Christ with an “X“. Will you do the same or trod upon The Road Not Taken, as Robert Frost put it……and “make all the difference”? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

 

 

The Fed Interest Rate Hike- Danger Ahead?

Ok, the Fed after a decade of manipulating interest rates to absurdly low levels (like 0%) finally bumped them up a quarter point. I’ve read some of the follow-up from the “experts” but quite frankly most of them are the standard stuff that doesn’t really reveal details the public should know about the Fed and interest rates. They simply run off a list of expected impacts.

Let’s take a moment here and peek behind the curtain of this topic of the Fed and interest rates in the hopes of helping to make sense of this issue. I will not just shallowly skirt the surface to make myself sound like an “expert” I promise. (Follow the links for more details BTW.)

What Are Interest Rates?

Distilling it down to the basics, the interest rate is the cost of currency lent to someone or some institution. For the typical individual, if they borrow money from a bank, they would be charged an interest rate or cost on that money which continues until the money plus interest is paid back. Same with your credit card.

The Fed interest rate is what the Fed charges to lend money to their customers, generally the government and huge international financiers/banks. They bumped it up .25%. Not a huge deal but here’s some things to understand about the Fed and interest rates.

Where Does the Fed Get the Money to Lend?

Do they get it from investments? Does it come from commodity guarantees like from what they hold in gold or silver? Are their assets backing it?

Well, the answers to all those questions would be, no. The real truth is that the Fed simply generates our currency on the basis of a privilege granted to them by our Congress in 1913. That privilege which granted them a charter as the central bank for the United States allows them to generate money from nothing.

That’s correct- nothing. The Fed has no reserves to back our currency. It simply creates it from nothing but electronic blips on a computer screen. G. Edward Griffin, author of the definitive book on the Federal Reserve “The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve” describes this congressional privilege as “The Mandrake Mechanism“.

You’ll note on the Federal Reserve Note (FRN) the phrase, “This note is legal tender for all debts. public and private.” Pull out any FRN and you’ll see it very small print on the front of the bill.

In other words, our currency is not usable for anything but debt! As long as we accept that non-redeemable (in commodities like precious metals) paper as a debt exchange instrument, it has value.

What is Money Today?

In order to understand the impact of interest, you first have to understand what money is. In the simplest terms, money is that which enables us to purchase services or products from other people. Hence, money can be anything widely accepted as payment for products or services. We could exchange dogs and cats for money if we wanted to. (Don’t think the dogs and cats would like that nor the dog and cat lovers but just saying that to make a point.)

However, in modern times, money is the replacement for barter. In place of trading another desired good for another desired good (dogs and cats again?), we use a generally accepted form of money called the Federal Reserve Note.

After the Federal Reserve- Money Changed

Gold Certificate_100 Dollars

Gold Certificate-One Hundred Dollars in Gold Coin Payable to the Bearer on Demand

Our money used to be commodity money. That is, it used to be redeemable in gold or silver coin upon demand. There were some advantages to this, mainly for the user of this type of money.

First of all intrinsic value. Gold cannot be created with the flick of a pen. There is a limited amount of it, it needs to be mined with labor and it is desired, it tends to have stable value. The user of this type of commodity money knew that it could be exchanged for an equivalent quantity of gold coin. So it had intrinsic and BTW universally accepted value. (For more on gold as money read, Why Gold-Backed Money Doesn’t Bring Booms and Busts.)

It was still fiat money. That is, money by decree of the government, but it was redeemable in an exchangeable commodity that was considered valuable.

Entre- the Federal Reserve and the game changed.

With the advent of the Federal Reserve in 1913, money instead of being fiat and redeemable became a new creation- Fiat and irredeemable. Still by decree, no longer redeemable in coin, however, it was also came with something even more insidious. Not only is it by decree only and not redeemable in anything else as a certificate for a commodity but it was also…

Debt Money

Thanks to our Congress, the Federal Reserve Act created a hybrid kind of “Federal” agency called the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve according even to its defenders, “the Fed is an independent agency that can conduct its duties without political pressure.” Good as far as it goes but fails to mention that politicians need both media support and money. The media has been monopolized into a cartel. Major Corporations need free access to money as do politicians.

So, can you see where the suppliers of money into the system (The Fed) may, just may, have a little bit of leverage over the government and the media as well? Perhaps the pressure is not coming from political pressure but the other way around. After all, you cannot bite the hand that feeds you without ending up hungry can you?

When the government/politicians need more money than comes from taxes, fees and fines, the government turns to the Fed. That creates the federal deficit which is spending over intake.

The Fed in turn creates new money from nothing for the government through the Mandrake Mechanism. It also lends this fiat, irredeemable currency created from nothing to the government with interest. This is unlike a normal fiat system because now the money has a debt attached to it on top of its creation from nothing- hence it is now debt money.

Here’s the Real Problem

By creating money and putting it into circulation only when a loan is made, and then removing it from circulation when the loan is repaid, the Federal Reserve cartel has created a perfect debt trap. Any meaningful attempt to escape this debt trap, by paying down debt, will trigger an automatic “correction mechanism” that guarantees failure.

The chain of events is very predictable. The nation decides to pay down debt. We also begin to limit spending and not take out new loans. (Ok, I admit this is a bit idyllic and not very realistic with today’s crop of spenders of public money in office. However, stay with me as I am just painting a best outcome possibility picture to make a point.)

Naturally, since all money is debt based, the economy’s debt-based money supply will shrink. Now, this will begin to create some disruptions in the economy. Initially the disruptions will be minor. Over time they will become intolerable, unless new money is injected back into the economy through new loans.

Why? Well, perhaps a 10 percent reduction in the nation’s money supply wouldn’t be traumatically disruptive. However, suppose it ramped  up to a 40 percent reduction, or a 60 percent reduction, or even an 80 percent reduction. Imagine an economy with 80% less money circulating in it. What kind of impact would that have?

Robert Hemphill, credit manager of the Atlanta Federal Reserve bank in the forward to 100% Money by Irving Fisher, put it this way:

“If all the bank loans were paid, no one could have a bank deposit, and there would not be a dollar of coin or currency in circulation. This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have… If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless situation is almost incredible— but there it is.”

The real problem then? As a nation we are locked into a cycle of ever increasing debt, or a system of financial servitude to the Federal Reserve cartel that is literally inescapable.

National Debt

Now, one can see why the national debt keeps growing. It has to. Otherwise, the money supply for the nations economy will shrink since it is based upon a debt based money supply. That’s why we are encouraged to keep spending (not saving). That’s also why the need for constant wars, entitlement growth, educational loans, credit card spending, etc. Debt fuels the system that the banking cartel created when the Federal Reserve was created. Without debt, the system collapses.

The Interest Rate

First of all, having interest rates controlled by a tiny minority of elite bankers or international financiers is abominable. Think about it. A tiny minority of who we are supposed to revere as “wise men” control the cost and volume of money for the entire nation. Seattle to Miami and Portland, Maine to San Diego, Calif. This doesn’t even include the money lent overseas or used to finance our ongoing “war(s) on terror”

Here’s how this control hurts us. They arbitrarily decide (always for their best interests BTW) that it would be best for all of us if the interest rate they were charging was zero. What does this do?

Savings are not only discouraged but penalized. Why save at an absolutely pitiful rate of .25%? At that rate, may as well spend it because you won’t be alive to see the money grow to any appreciable level of gain anyway.

Spending up to the highest levels is encouraged. When Bush took over the national debt stood at the massive (at the time) level of $5.6 Trillion. When Obama took over it was about $10.3 Trillion. As I write this according to the U.S. National Debt Clock, it currently stands at :

While the interest rate hike will boost savings returns a bit and perhaps annuities, it will also raise credit card interest, student loan interest, bank loan interest and most insidiously the interest on the national debt.

The most quickly felt will be the national debt velocity as government is a first level customer. The rest will trickle down a bit more slowly, maybe. Who knows? Banks and credit cards may simply, like the oil companies when a potentially precipitating event occurs, use it as an excuse to jettison rates up a bit anyway.

The Danger?

The Fed goes beyond .25% and continues to ramp up its rate of lending. Having read this article you can already figure out what will happen. The money supply will contract in increasing velocity with each rate hike. Eventually, like a rubber band springing back in response to being snapped, debt money will need to be injected into our debt based economy.

Like the rubber band however, it will not return to its original position but spring beyond it. This could trigger hyperinflation. Think Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe etc. In other words a complete economic collapse.

So while some may applaud the Fed’s move, I see it as potential danger signal. If interest rates continue to climb so will the national debt.

More debt means the currency continue to drop in value. (It is already inflated to the point of being worth less than 5 cents of its value when the Fed began in 1913. That means that 5 cents would purchase more than what a dollar will today back in 1913.) As it drops in value, more dollars are needed to purchase the same things.

We are seeing that already as food costs are rising or for the same money you are getting less food. (Seen in the form of lowered quantity in packaged goods. Look for it as you shop. You’ll see how food distributors are masking inflation of their production costs to keep us buying.)

There is a whole lot I left out of our economic set up in this article. I really just touched upon the topic of the Fed and our economy. There are also solutions to all of this. It does not include the continuance of the Fed of course. As pointed out briefly here. This Federal Reserve System is a system of financial servitude designed to make as little more than debt slaves.

I hope this article helps you to see that. For more, watch the YouTube with G. Edward Griffin, read The Creature from Jekyll Island already mentioned above or a shorter version of the story in Dishonest Money: Financing the Road to Ruin by Joseph Plummer. Suggestions for change are contained therein.

Meanwhile, pay attention to the Fed interest rate. It could signal danger ahead.

Whatever Happened to the Concept of Free Market Health Care?

Recently on Quora the question was asked- Why Doesn’t the United States Provide Universal Healthcare Like Other Countries?

One person who lives in Australia provided the following answer:

“I’m in Australia, and while we are a lot better off than the USA – we DO have a free health care service – there is too little of it, too late – too many people needing to access services for which there isn’t enough funding allocated, not enough beds, not enough people employed – the health system is crumbling under the pressure and people are suffering for it. I wish there was some established standard of health care, world wide, that all health systems had to adhere to, and that health care could be accessible to every single human being as a matter of basic human rights, no matter where they were or where they came from or their capacity to pay for it.”

I find this comment interesting and flawed. The person who made the comment is obviously basing it on some unproven assumptions. She first assumes that had government acted sooner we wouldn’t have the problems in health care that we have now. Naturally, there is no consideration given to the possibility that not only is government NOT fixing the problem but quiteHealth Care Costs likely are making it worse.

Free Isn’t Free

She also assumes that she is a “whole lot better off” U.S. citizens because “we DO have a free health care service.” Free? Really? So nobody performing the service receives compensation for their labor?

Oh……..they do? Ever thought about how the workers in health care derive incomes? Think the source may come from the government perchance? Where do you suppose the government which produces nothing but regulatory control gets their money? Three basic sources: taxation (including licensing fees), central bank money printing (the primary source) and regulatory fines. Ultimately, however, the people pay the costs of government one way or another. Either through taxes, fines, fees or the increased costs of inflation.

So then, how in fact can government insurance be considered “free”?

Hint: It isn’t. Most folks simply aren’t sensible enough to recognize that “there is no such thing as a free lunch.” Other citizens (particularly those working and earning money) are paying for this so-called “free” healthcare.

Now, if you consider the necessary increased taxation, fees and regulations, inflationary pressure driving costs up from increased debt and the immorality of legalized theft better off, perhaps you need a better concept of what it means to actually be a free born person. Personally, being a wage slave and having half of your income siphoned off for an arbitrary benefit that government decides how to distribute is not my idea of free.

I earn. They take. They decide where and how much of the fruits of my labor belongs to them before I get any of it. Not my idea of “better off”. Personally, it feels like I am a subject of the State,  and most certainly not free.

However, that aside, let’s get back to the consideration that government rather than fixing the healthcare marketplace is in actuality making it worse.

Frankly, the reality is that nearly everything which governments get involved in seems to decline in quality of service or good and rise in price.

Medicare for example is for all intents and purposes broke and getting broker. Totally, a government run program it has escalated in both regulatory control and price. More on this later in this article. Let’s take a look at some of the ways Medicare is failing.

Medicare Fraud

As an example of how well government serves as a custodian of markets, I point to the multi-billion $ scams that criminals are running using Medicare as the payoff faucet. Not only is the Medicare scamming very profitable for the scammers but it is also easier and less dangerous. According to the 60 Minutes report, Medicare fraud has replaced drugs as the #1 criminal pursuit in Florida thanks to the ease with which criminals can penetrate the great government regulatory system.

Medicare Broke As Well?

We already know that Medicare is a scam target but how profitable is it? After all, any ongoing service needs to produce some kind of profit doesn’t it in order to provide an income to those who perform the labor right? Even non-profits need to make some kind of profit to share with the workers who produce results who need to feed themselves and live.

Fortunately, according to the trustees for Medicare, the system will not be broke until 2024. I suppose that is the good news but it is not very encouraging for those currently paying into the system in their early 50’s.

Also noted in the 2008 report summary:

“Projected long-run program costs for both Medicare and Social Security are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing, and will require legislative corrections if disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers are to be avoided.”

They are not sustainable because Medicare is being funded by younger workers. Baby boomers who made up the bulk of the working marketplace for many years are reaching retirement age in growing numbers. Mathematically this means that as the millions of baby boomers retire there will be less younger workers to fund them.

According to a 2008 Trustees report the unfunded liability (expected future payments) for Medicare is $74 Trillion or 5 times that of Social Security. Since our current national debt is sitting at nearly $18.8 Trillion or over $58,000 per man, woman and child that is also nearly 4 times our present national debt alone. This does not speak well of government management which Obamacare BTW piles on to markedly with its huge regulatory additions.

BTW, with this kind of track record in government health care how do we expect more government to “fix” the problem? May I go out on a limb and suggest that it will not? Hint: It won’t!

Free Market? What Free Market?

First of all, health care in the U.S. is far from government free. It has been that way for decades. It is already the MOST regulated market segment in the nation in spite of the fact that there is no Constitutional authority for our Federal government to enter into and interfere with private markets. Health care is not and has not been a “free” market segment for quite some time already.

The biggest intrusion into the private health care market as noted began with Medicare. Having been in the insurance industry at the time, the striking rise in premium costs in the health care market began shortly a few years thereafter. The rise in costs of the marketplace, as regulatory oversight on the part of the government has grown, has been significant. It can be expected to continue to the point of bankruptcy.

Of course, most citizens are led to believe that the government caused disruption of the market requires even MORE government to correct it. Where have they gotten that idea one may ask?

The Media Monopoly’s Role

As noted on the home page, 6 major Corporations own over 90% of all major media, including print. One only has to note how the same “news” events and spin is placed on the same issues in every major market at the same time to confirm the news monopoly.

Employees of the monopolized media also have a mandate to perform the bidding of its employer or simply risk getting fired. Consequently, the message conveyed to the public is that the State is good and free markets are bad. Why?

Simple. Multi-national Corporations won’t bite the government hand that feeds them.

Especially when more government regulation helps the larger, deeper pocketed Corporation (which can absorb the increased regulatory costs) squeeze out competition from smaller competitors. The Corporation may lose more to regulatory costs on the front end, but pick it up on the back end with increased market share as smaller business get squeezed out. The larger Corporations then siphon up the ensuing customer dollars which have to go somewhere. (In addition to the Obamacare mandate that guarantees them a steady supply of customers by eliminating free market choice.)

Therefore, the theme the consumer gets from the Corporate controlled media is that a State run monopoly is well meaning and good which is why our Australian friend is convinced that government run health care makes her “better off”.

On the other hand, those nasty entrepreneurial people left on their own in a marketplace where the consumer actually votes with their earned income, are bad because they are greedy and only want your money at all costs.

The Part Left Out of This Model

What is missed here is that when the consumer is in control of whom they select as their provider, quality of service for money spent is a major factor influencing their selection.

This mechanism in turn encourages the provider of the good or service to maintain the highest quality at the most competitive price. Now why would that happen?

Well, the consumer in a truly free market has the option to simply take their dollars somewhere else that offers better service or goods for lower cost. (An option eliminated by Obamacare as we know.)

In short, the consumers provide feedback to the provider of the good or service of how they are doing in meeting consumer needs and desires. That feedback comes to the provider in the form of dollars offered for services rendered. Do a bad job and customers take their money elsewhere.

This was the way the medical marketplace was operating until government got its foot in the door with Medicare and Medicaid. (And now Obamacare? Isn’t this adding insult to injury?)

Now, prices have risen markedly, quality of service is decreasing and the solution of course, according to the State is more government regulatory control! Not very logical but hey logic ain’t part of the decision making when you can just print money or take it from the complacent citizens who are foolish enough to think they are getting something for “free”.

Are There Any Free Markets Left and How are They Doing?

Lets briefly compare a lightly regulated marketplace where consumers actually do vote with their earned incomes- the technology market place.Technology

New discovery and product improvements are regular and expected. Prices regularly fall on previous products which for all intents and purpose are still more than adequate for the majorities needs. Yet they are regularly replaced by something even better! The innovation continues on without pause. Quite frankly the marketplace is stimulating and highly innovative, bringing out the best of the best.

Additionally, opportunity to enter into this market still allows for that unknown innovator to rise to the top by coming up with something newer and better. They can even be from 3rd world nations and/or not even participants in the highest levels of higher education who can still become successful because the free marketplace rewards results not regulations and licenses.

What About the Free Market Model in the Medical Marketplace?

Could that kind of free market innovation also be applied to the medical marketplace? Well yeah, perhaps once. However, I would sadly venture to say- not any more.

As regulatory control of this market grows (and Obamacare will guarantee that trajectory) innovators will shun it, not embrace it.

The best and brightest will as well. After all, why should they incur a 200 or $300,000 nut and end up little more than a government employee?

What Will Likely Happen Instead

As the medical marketplace continues to worsen (and I predict it will), Politicians and the experts in government will call for even more regulation to fix the problem they created.

However, that will get lost in the din of the media’s incessant drumbeat for an immediate solution. The big news will be change is needed but not today- yesterday!

The coercive force of the State or Government will beneficently grant their request and additional regulation will be trumpeted as the hero.

Meanwhile, back in reality, the services and quality will suffer and the cry for YET MORE regulation will once again raise its inevitable ugly head. The Leviathan of State will gladly, for the controlling minority not the controlled masses, reign.

Free market? What free market? There hasn’t been one in health care for decades. As the government Leviathan grows all of them are disappearing in fact.

Nevertheless, has it ever occurred to anyone to think of applying that nasty greed label to those in control of this circus, that is, those in authority- governments, banksters and Corporations?

Naaaah…..they are only doing it for our own good as any parent would for their children. They are motivated only by a deep concern for humankind that borders on complete self sacrifice right? (Pssssst……..if you’re buying that one, contact me about the bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn. Real cheap BTW.)

So What Do We Do With This Information Anyway?- Part Two

In part one, we went over some of the deceptions and challenges we face today on this planet. Despite the claim that mankind is “evolving”, the evidence of growth is pretty sparse. Immorality has become part of the accepted norm. Parents with children have to cringe at some of the programming on TV these days. Daytime TV talk shows have guests that cover personal issues that belong in the bedroom not on national television. Some of the answers in Family Feud even cause one to shake one’s head these days they are so crude.

Wars are an ongoing and constant part of our lives. The only advancement over the Old Testament times is that the technology has increased efficiency and the threat that mankind can completely eliminate all life on the planet if it carries these conflicts too far. As far as a difference in behavior? What change? Mankind is just as violent today as he was in the recorded history of ancient times it seems. The only thing that has evolved is the technology mankind uses to kill themselves.

Let’s Put a Little Perspective on This

Take a careful look at the picture to the right. It is an actual photograph taken in 1990 from 3.7 Billion miles away from our planet by Voyager 1 (13 years after it was launched). Note the brownish

The Earth appears as a tiny dot in the brown band within the darkness of deep space 3.7 Billion miles away.

The Earth appears as a tiny dot in the brown band within the darkness of deep space 3.7 Billion miles away.

band to the right of the image. About halfway up this band there is a tiny, little bluish-white speck. That’s our planet. A more expanded view is available in this YouTube clip from the DVD The Privileged Planet (See whole DVD presentation on YouTube here.). At the end of a 6 minute presentation you can view here, this picture is zoomed in on to present a closer perspective.

So what can we learn from this?

Being objective and putting aside speculation, here’s what we must accept about our place in the universe.

We are an orb of material somehow suspended in a vacuum. The biblical explanation in Job written over 3,500 years ago is that God “stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.” Job 26:7

I’m not sure there is a scientific explanation that can explain this. Factually speaking, its a mysterious circumstance that we all take for granted. However, it get’s even more mysterious.

Our planet is not only suspended in space but it is also suspended in the perfect position in our galaxy and solar system to support life. As the documentary based on the book The Privileged Planet points out, there are over 20 factors that are perfectly aligned to support life on this planet. Calculating the odds it would be inconceivable as to how these factors could come together by accident or by themselves.

Additionally, based on the evidence, our planet is the only planet known to us capable of supporting life. I’m not talking about speculations or fantasies like Star Wars (unless you think it was a documentary) but actual evidence. The fact is, there is NO evidence that life exists anywhere but here. The Voyager photograph supports this as it appears that the only illuminated planet in this deep space photo is the earth! And we all know that without the sun illuminating this planet, life as we know it would not be possible.

So What’s the Point?

Good question. Let’s consider it.

The point is that what you accept as the answer to the above mystery, that is whether life on this planet is generated by a Supreme Being. or whether life generated itself spontaneously without the input of an intelligent agent through evolutionary processes, will determine what direction you turn towards for solutions to the problems humanity is facing.

Will we turn to man for the answers? About 6,000 years of recorded history have demonstrated how well that has worked so far. I suggest that the results have been less than stellar.

Should we turn to God for the answer? Well, which one? The God of the bible, Allah, the Jehovah Witness solutions, Buddhism, Hinduism?

Where Do You Stand?

After quite a while of looking at the issues from political, economic, social and spiritual perspectives I lean towards a created universe. My solutions also lean towards a biblical perspective.

However, you may be one who considers themselves an evolutionist or believe that all of this just happened without the input of any intelligence all by itself. Your solutions then could not, of course, include God. They would necessarily place man in control.

Nevertheless, however you decide to make sense of the facts of our place in this universe will determine what solutions you seek and accept.

Will you turn to God based solutions or man based solutions? There really is no in between. Either this universe was created or it created itself.

Keep in mind that man based solutions would be Communist and Socialist oriented whereby the State becomes the Supreme Being and the New World Order is world government run by man.

Biblically based solutions would include principles and perspectives from the bible. These would ultimately place God as the controlling interest of course.

At any rate, all of this is just food for thought to lend a bit of perspective on the issues we face today. I invite responses and questions. But I’ll leave this where it is for now- mired with questions and choices based on your answers to those questions.

Another Obama Sell Out- The Paris Climate Change Deal

GoreApplaudingParisClimateDeal

Fat Albert Liked the Deal of Course

I find it ironic that the new Paris Climate Change deal is called COP21 which is short for 21st Conference of Parties. It’s could just as well be short for 21st Century Cop it seems. That is, a global climate change cop which is the role this deal places into the hands of the UN at the expense of U.S. sovereignty.

I also find it interesting that by 2018 the 200 countries in the deal have to submit their climate change plans in 5 year increments. Five year planning is straight out of the Communist playbook for the “planned”economy model. A model used by the tyrannical, brutal regimes of Mao Tse Tung and Josef Stalin, both of whom were Communists as well as avowed atheists.

5 Year Planning- A Successful Model to Emulate?

It was during Mao’s 5 year Great Leap Forward from 1958 to 1963 that over 40 million people starved to death under the failed agricultural policies of that intended leap forward. Unfortunately, for the people, (You know of the “power to the people” group.) it was a leap backwards in both population and production. And unfortunately, truly a dead end for millions. Jasper Becker‘s book on the topic Hungry Ghosts wrote about an article that appeared in Hong Kong’s Kaifang Magazine in 1994 which related a case where:

“Parents ordered their 7 year old daughter to boil some water to cook their little son. When the baby was eaten, the daughter was told to boil some more water. Realizing that she would be next she knelt down, ‘begging her father not to eat her and saying “I will do anything if you do not eat me.”

Cannibalism during the Great Leap Forward was not uncommon BTW. Becker devoted an entire chapter to the topic in his book.

Five year planning is a Communist economic hallmark and has inevitably failed, time and again. It is also a tell tale sign of where this climate change deal is coming from as well.

BTW, What Happened to Global Warming?

Another interesting facet of this deal is that in recent years as global temperatures have dropped the catch phrase for saving us from ourselves (by placing government in complete authority over energy production) has changed from global warming to climate change. So, what happened to global warming? Why the change of catch phrase?

As global temperatures have dropped, the name was changed to save face when climate facts trumped media and UN hype. It also had the added benefit of confusing the public as well. Global warming is a known commodity. Climate change though? That is as nebulous a description as the “war on terror”. Meanwhile, the Federal government is busy expanding the definitions for labeling one a terrorist.

The label climate change is just as nebulous. I mean really what is scary about climate change? I live in a temperate zone. The climate changes 4 times a year. Do I now need to have these changes regulated? We have Summer, Fall, Winter and Spring. I sure am thankful that the government has stepped in to regulate the change of seasons. I guess……anyway.

Can there perhaps be something more to this climate change stuff than meets the eye?

Obama Applauds the Agreement- So Does the CFR

ObamaPraisingParisClimateChgDeal

Obama was smugly happy that his Marxist buds’s in the UN passed the deal. In an address from the White House he said:

“I want to give a special thanks to Secretary John Kerry, my Senior Advisor Brian Deese, Chief Negotiator Todd Stern and everyone on their teams for their outstanding work and making America proud. I also want to thank the people of 200 nations, large and small, developed and developing, for working together to confront a threat to the people of all nations. Together we have shown whats possible when the world stands as one. Today the American people can be proud because this historic agreement is a tribute to American leadership. Over the past 7 years we’ve transformed America into the global leader in fighting climate change.

First of all, the deal has the footprints of the globalist, bankster led Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) all over it. John Kerry is a member of this insider group. Todd Stern, mentioned as Chief Negotiator, is a member of the CFR as well. Sure enough, the CFR site applauds the deal as well with a lead article entitled, Two Cheers for the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.

Obama tells us that we are “making America proud”? He tells us today, “Americans can be proud”? He tells us “we’ve transformed America into the global leader in fighting climate change?

First of all, what are Americans supposed to be proud of exactly? Fighting climate change? Didn’t know we were in a fight to begin with. I thought climates simply changed naturally. I don’t remember asking him to push for this deal that trades away American sovereignty to the UN. Personally, having less of a nation and part of a group of 200 plus on which we are on a level playing field with tiny, undeveloped nations doesn’t make me swell with American-based pride. But hey, maybe that’s just me.

The fact is, most Americans have little to no idea of what is going on here? To me, this is yet another example of the authority of the State advancing itself into the position of parent over the citizens seen as its children. The negotiators for this deal are members of elitist globalist organizations like the CFR, whose members include all of the too big to fail banks and whose honorary Chairman is David C. Rockefeller. Are we to be proud that they are making broad based decisions for us? Particularly since those decisions benefit Corporations and not the people in the end. Lets take a closer look at that part.

Cui Bono? “To Whose Profit”

Rolling Stone wrote an article in 2010 called the Great American Bubble Machine. It was an article directed primarily at Goldman Sachs, Founders level Corporate member of the CFR. The 6th bubble covered in the article was global warming (It was still global warming then instead of the more nebulous climate change label of today.). They discussed a key component of the Paris deal, then known as Cap and Trade aimed at climate control but rather control of energy production. Here’s what they had to say about it:

The new game in town, the next bubble, is in carbon credits — a booming trillion dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an “environmental plan,” called cap-and-trade.

The new carbon credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that’s been kind to Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won’t even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in advance.

Here’s how it works: If the bill passes, there will be limits for coal plants, utilities, natural-gas distributors and numerous other industries on the amount of carbon emissions (a.k.a. greenhouse gases) they can produce per year. If the companies go over their allotment, they will be able to buy “allocations” or credits from other companies that have managed to produce fewer emissions. President Obama conservatively estimates that about $646 billion worth of carbon credits will be auctioned in the first seven years; one of his top economic aides speculates that the real number might be twice or even three times that amount.

The feature of this plan that has special appeal to speculators is that the “cap” on carbon will be continually lowered by the government, which means that carbon credits will become more and more scarce with each passing year. Which means that this is a brand new commodities market where the main commodity to be traded is guaranteed to rise in price over time. The volume of this new market will be upwards of a trillion dollars annually; for comparison‘s sake, the annual combined revenues of all electricity suppliers in the U.S. total $320 billion.

Goldman wants this bill. The plan is (1) to get in on the ground floor of paradigm-shifting legislation, (2) make sure that they’re the profit-making slice of that paradigm and (3) make sure the slice is a big slice. Goldman started pushing hard for cap-and-trade long ago, but things really ramped up last year when the firm spent $3.5 million to lobby climate issues.

In addition to the windfall to leading Corporate members of the CFR, Al Gore applauding the deal above is also heavily invested in the potential cap and trade industry. He stands to profit handily from this deal. So is it any wonder that both the CFR and Gore applaud this deal?

More American Sovereignty Handed Over

While the Corporate motivations are transparent, Obama’s is a little more concealed. The fact is, Obama is trading away more of our self-governance to the UN (A CFR construction from the get go BTW.) He hasn’t been the first President to do so. It’s been going on for decades. Heck, every time our troops are placed under NATO, they are transferred from U.S. troops into UN troops. This, of course, never makes it to the public through our mainstream media.

The ultimate control in this deal is the UN as well. “The agreement calls for a signature ceremony in April 2016, and requests that the U.N. Secretary-General keep the agreement open for signing until April 2017.”

This places the U.S. on an equal playing field with all of the countries in the deal “large and small, developed and undeveloped” as Obama put it in his White House address.

But Wait, There’s More!

Oh yes, and in addition to the loss of sovereignty to the UN and its Communist oriented membership; a significant and steady rise in energy costs and Corporate cronyism, there is yet another poke in the eye of the American public. “The agreement calls for developed countries to raise at least $100 billion annually in order to assist developing countries.”

Well now, where do you think the lion’s share of that money will come from? Guess who will foot the bill? Hint: It won’t be Corporations.

I wonder just how proud are we going to feel while we are adopting more taxation along with significantly rising cost of energy while the privileged few Corporations feast on our offerings? We are already taxed to the tune of over half of our incomes meaning we are wage slaves half a year. Do we need even more taxes? Does this fall into the Obama, “Change We Need” part of the Obama plan to save America?

Under a Marxist economy, you level wealth down by increasing taxation and transferring the wealth.  Don’t look too closely but that is exactly what this plan does!

PinnochioDonkeyBoys

Are We All Like the Lost Boys Too?

Don’t know about you but I see the New World Order being unfolded right before our very eyes.

Debt is growing. The State is adopting more control over the citizens. More of our Constitutionally granted sovereignty is being handed over to the global government template, the UN.

Meanwhile, most of us are wrapped up in who will win Survivor, The Voice and the Super Bowl or another equivalent major sport.

Like the Lost Boys in Pinocchio, we are playing while our so-called leaders are turning us into wage slave donkeys. Hee haw, the jokes on us and it ain’t funny.

So What Do You Do With This Information Anyway?- Part One

I was having an email discussion with someone the other day discussing the topic of our perverted system. Her conclusion was that life was weird and we are all nuts. I guess it can look that way if you don’t see the forest for the trees. That is, you focus too closely on the events and miss the overall. So what do you do with this information anyway?

I mean, if you take it at face value, it’s all one big mess. There are conflicts everywhere from dysfunctional families to dysfunctional nations. It seems like a new war starts up every few months or so. Natural disasters appear to be growing, not to mention the human generated ones. Hunger in our world is a very real problem and if the central banking model is taken to its historical

Mommy, I'm hungry. Food mommy, please.

Mommy, I’m hungry. Food mommy, please.

conclusion, it will get worse, far worse. And it will not be poor third world children but our children. Perhaps, even us. As Bob Dylan once crooned:

And what’ll you do now, my blue-eyed son?
And what’ll you do now my darling young one?
I’m a-goin’ back out ‘fore the rain starts a-fallin’
I’ll walk to the depths of the deepest black forest
Where the people are a many and their hands are all empty
Where the pellets of poison are flooding their waters
Where the home in the valley meets the damp dirty prison
Where the executioner’s face is always well hidden
Where hunger is ugly, where souls are forgotten
Where black is the color, where none is the number
And I’ll tell and think it and speak it and breathe it
And reflect it from the mountain so all souls can see it
Then I’ll stand on the ocean until I start sinkin’
But I’ll know my songs well before I start singin’
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, it’s a hard, and it’s a hard
It’s a hard rain’s a-gonna fall.

Well before Dylan was on the planet, Jesus disciples asked him privately on the Mount of Olives after he predicted the fall of the temple and subsequently Jerusalem:

“Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

And Jesus answered and said to them:

“Take heed that no one deceives you. For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many. And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not troubled; for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.” Matthew 24:3-8

The Beginnings of Sorrows?

Many biblically based Christians feel as though what is happening today may be pointing to the end of times and the 2nd coming of Christ as predicted in prophecy throughout the bible and fleshed out in The Revelation written by the apostle John while exiled on the island of Patmos (after being dipped in boiling oil I may add).

Is this really the beginning of sorrows and the end of this generation? My logical, analytical mind has me rejecting the possibility of the 2nd coming. That couldn’t possibly happen could it? How could Christ come again in the clouds on a white horse with all of the warrior angels? That is preposterous and illogical a part of me thinks.

On the other hand, prophecy in the bible (the only book of any religion that contains prophecy) has been uncannily accurate starting with the prisoner from Jerusalem Daniel’s dream interpretation to Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon predicting historical changes even leading up to the present. So do we just ignore it and cast it aside as that religious stuff? Or perchance is it really the beginning of sorrows? Are we in the “end game” or perhaps just entering into it?

It is One Possibility?

Dylan crooned, “a hard rain’s gonna fall“. Christ said, “All these are the beginning of sorrows.” Where is the evidence for either predicted scenario to come to pass one may ask? Let’s take a quick glance. Remember, the words are not fact based descriptions but rather somewhat symbolic in nature. Which is to say that they are pointing at events not describing them in detail. They are descriptions of the overall condition of our planet, general in nature but specific in category.

ChinaElectronicWasteDumping

Electronic Waste Pile in Guiyu, China

Dylan: “the pellets of poison are flooding their waters“. Can anyone deny that our planet is in need of a facelift and that our waters are becoming poisoned? Portions of China are becoming waste dumps for used electronics including their rivers. Pharmaceuticals in the water are becoming another source of pollution being overlooked. After a hospice patient dies the drugs, including CII or opiate-like drugs for pain, are not returned but  rather dumped into the water. And there is more.

Christ’s first response to his disciples about when will this happen was: “Take heed that no man deceive you” Why that response? That didn’t answer their question did it? Or did it?

ISIS/ISIL: An American Product?

The premise of this blog is deception abounds in the world today. The media cartel spins everything leaving out critical background information. For example, ISIS or ISIL (Islamic State essentially) is now a major enemy. What is left out of the equation is that ISIS/ISIL arose with the help of our s0-called “leaders”. In an article in the New American, entitled ISIS: The Best Terror Threat U.S. Tax Money Can Buy, one can see the manner in which this terror organization arose and it included U.S. help!

Now, don’t you think this information would be important for us to know? Why is it conveniently left out of the media reporting? As Christ stated thousands of years ago, “Take heed that….” Remember, what you don’t know won’t hurt you….or will it?

The Rothschild Formula

G. Edward Griffin in his book The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve fleshes out what he calls, The Rothschild Formula. It forms a template for how the central banking cartels create enemies. Why one may ask? With enemies war and its subsequent debt (which these parasites need and feed upon to further their debt based system) is not only possible but in their media controlled circus inevitable:

1. War is the ultimate discipline to any government. If it can successfully meet the challenge of war, it will survive. If it cannot, it will perish. All else is secondary. The sanctity of its laws, the prosperity of its citizens, and the solvency of it treasury will be quickly sacrificed by any government in its primal act of self-survival.

2. All that is necessary, therefore, to ensure that a government will maintain or expand its debt is to involve it in war or the threat of war. The greater the threat and the more destructive the war, the greater the need for debt.

3. To involve a country in war or the threat of war, it will be necessary for it to have enemies with credible military might. If such enemies already exist, all the better. If they exist but lack military strength, it will be necessary to provide them the money to build their war machine. If an enemy does not exist at all, then it will be necessary to create one by financing the rise of a hostile regime.

4. The ultimate obstacle is a government which declines to finance its wars through debt. Although this seldom happens, when it does, it will be necessary to encourage internal political opposition, insurrection, or revolution to replace that government with one that is more compliant to our will. The assassination of heads of state could play an important role in this process.

5. No nation can be allowed to remain militarily stronger than its adversaries, for that could lead to peace and a reduction of debt. To accomplish this balance of power, it may be necessary to finance both sides of the conflict. Unless one of the combatants is hostile to our interests and, therefore, must be destroyed, neither side should be allowed a decisive victory or defeat. While we must always proclaim the virtues of peace, the unspoken objective is perpetual war.

Read the formula above and see if it doesn’t seem to fit the constant conflict in our world today and our global central banking system. As previously mentioned in this blog, War is a Racket! And the banking cartel thrives upon it. There are multi-millions of military in the world today in over 171 nations. As Smedley Butler asked, tongue in cheek, in War is a Racket, “Hell’s bells are they being trained to be dancers?” Obviously not.

As Christ stated: “You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.” and as Dylan stated “The executioner’s face is always well hidden.” Obviously, we are not expected to focus on the high dividends war pays to the real executioners. We are led to focus instead on the enemy, oftentimes the end product of the Rothschild formula above.

Now What?

As noted in the title what are we to do with this information anyway? We see wars and rumours of wars growing, nations rising against nation. We see famines (world hunger), pestilences (bird flu etc.), and earthquakes (a symbolic representation of natural disasters) growing as well. Is this really the end times or simply an outcropping of population growth, perhaps both?

No one can say for sure. Even Christ cautioned, “Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.” Matthew 24:44 So, one can only look for the signs and when they grow know that the hour is nearer and “be ye also ready”.

How can one then, be ready? A good question and one with some answers that we can take a look at. I will explore this further in the next post attempting to provide some direction to the question first asked in this post: So what do we do with this information anyway?

A light hearted but honest cartoon which appeared on SNL one time only in 1998. You can see why. Just some food for thought:

San Bernardino Shooting, Yet Another Recent Example of the Failure of Gun Control

Ok, 14 Americans are dead, 16 injured. Immediately, Obama pushes for more gun control but urges prudence on labeling this a terrorist act or identifying Islamic terrorist connections. Why so careful about the connection to so-called radical Islam but so quick to jump on the gun control bandwagon?

It should be transparent by now that Obama, the closet Marxist, favors gun control over acts of terror since he uses every single case of a shooting to highlight the need for more gun control. Permit me to speculate here but one of the best ways to impose tyranny is to disarm the population. Marxism and the New World Order require both, i.e, a disarmed population and tyranny.

In front of the UN building in NYC. The UN's stance on gun control anyone?

In front of the UN building in NYC. Notice the Chosen Weapon- A Non-Military Handgun

Paris- The Failure of Gun Control

Paris has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world. Heck even the police cannot carry weapons in Paris. How did that work out for the people killed over there? Seven shooters killed or injured over 500 people in about 30 minutes (an average of 70 per shooter). Since there was no opposition, they calmly reloaded 3 or 4 times killing people lying on the floor of the movie theater venue for example with no resistance in sight. I wonder how that would have played out in an armed population?

Why is it that the sites chosen are invariably “gun free” zones? The Batman shooter- a gun free theater. Virginia Tech shooting– gun free campus. Texas army base shooting- gun free military base. (Yes, the soldiers are not permitted to carry on the base.) Anyone seeing a pattern here?

Yet Another Failure, San Bernardino

Once again, the failure of gun control raises its ugly head. The media of course ignore it but the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California, the site of the recent massacre of innocents by a husband and wife, is another gun-free zone. This is never really highlighted by the media however. Instead, Obama’s gun control comments take precedence.

Why does the media choose to ignore the obvious fact that this shooting was conducted in a “gun-free” zone? We know they hardly mention or completely ignore the connection between mass shootings and psychotropic drugs over the past 20 years. Instead the focus is on the weapon used, not the connection between drugs and gun free zones.

It may be easy to make the connection between advertiser revenues and drugs. According to the National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM Foundation) in their year 2000 study (the latest they have on the issue on their site):

  • Prescription drugs advertised directly to consumers are now the largest and fastest selling medicines increasing 19% 1999.
  • Just 25 top-selling medicines promoted directly to consumers accounted for 40.7% — or $7.2 billion — of the overall $17.7 billion increase in retail drug spending in 1999.
  • The same 25 top-selling drugs had an aggregate one-year sales growth in 1999 of 43.2%. The growth in sales for all other drugs was 13.3 %.
  • Doctors wrote 34.2% more prescriptions in 1999 than in 1998 for the 25 DTC- promoted drugs that contributed most to overall drug spending.
  • Doctors wrote only 5.1% more prescriptions for all other prescription drugs.
  • The top 25 most heavily advertised drugs in 1999 accounted for 77% of all mass media advertising dollars for prescription drugs.

I think its safe to conclude that the media will not bite the hand that feeds it. We all can observe that since this study was done, ads on TV from Big Pharma have increased significantly. The connection between gun free zones and shootings or the gun control vs. no gun control issue is obviously less transparent.

What is the Connection Between the Media Reporting and Gun Control?

As pointed out on the home page, there is a massive monopolization of the media by Corporations. So it stands to reason that if you work for them and wish to remain employed, the spin you choose to apply will be that approved by those who pay you, the owners or controllers of the media.

Navy_Global_Force

How Is It “America’s Navy” If It Serving Under NATO, a UN Agency? Who Pays the Debt Incurred BTW?

Do the owners have an agenda then? Of course, they do. One doesn’t have to do a great deal of tedious research to determine their agenda of globalization. It is now accepted as fact that it is necessary for the United States to be fighting wars on foreign soils for decades now on the other side of the planet. As noted before in this blog, the Navy was running commercials ending with the catch phrase, Navy, A Global Force for Good. The assumption being that we are the policeman of the planet generating more debt for our citizens serving global needs.

Who pays the debt incurred? Who benefits the most from the debt? Who benefits the least? How is it “America’s Navy” if it is serving under NATO and the UN.? Do the nations served inherit any of the debt generated for the services of our Navy? Do our citizens get to choose any of the missions whose debt we inherit? How then is it “America’s Navy”? American’s don’t choose where to send it do they?

So just what is the connection between media reporting and gun control? Honest answers to the above questions lead us away from what the media would have us assume. Our military is being used by the UN under NATO to fight foreign wars etc. yet the UN is pushing for global gun control emphasizing control of weapons used for civilian protection. Meanwhile, the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council are the 5 largest arms dealers in the world. Anyone talking about controlling the military?

Additionally, one world government can only be enforced under a tyrannical reign as in Communist run countries where authority controls the people under the tyranny of a police state. There is a human cost for disarmament. A good read on this issue is Death by Gun Control by Aaron Zelman and Richard W. Stevens. Curiously however, it is now out of print and the prices are jacked up on Amazon. Always seems to happen to books that pull away that curtain from the wizard it seems. I wonder why?

May I suggest that gun control is not really aimed at control of the gun but rather control of the people. As noted in the book above, Death by Gun Control, all genocides are proceeded by gun control or citizen disarmament as in Nazi Germany, Rwanda, China, Cambodia, Russia and others.

Professors Say Elf on the Shelf Bad for Kids, But Let’s Dig a Little Deeper

Philosopher and cultural theorist Michel Foucault warned of a 1984 style society which is under constant surveillance. In the late 18th century Philosopher Jeremy Bentham designed the panopticon. This building is a type of prison wherein all the cells are visible from the center thereby engendering the feeling that someone is watching you, even if you know the contrary. In the panopticon, the inmates never know when they are being watched so they are forced to follow the rules all the time or risk even more punishment.Elf on the Shelf

According to Laura Pinto and Selena Nemorin, the Elf on the Shelf model raises the question that this cute little elf may be “preparing a generation of children to accept, not question, increasingly intrusive (albeit whimsically packaged) modes of surveillance.” A panopticon society of sorts in which the citizens like Orwell’s 1984 State are under constant watch by “Big Brother.”

In the paper written for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, the authors claim that, “The Elf on the Shelf serves functions that are aligned to the official functions of the panopticon,……In doing so, it contributes to the shaping of children as governable subjects.”

A Little Further Down the Rabbit Hole

Be that as it may, now that this can of worms has been opened I think we can go a little further down the rabbit hole- children’s shows. Now, I know that this may be considered an assault on some parental “sacred cows” but pause for a moment and ponder if you will.

We all love Sesame Street don’t we? I mean two generations of children now have delighted to Big Bird, Bert and Ernie, Elmo and company right? After all, they not only teach our children useful skills like learning the alphabet, numbers, colors, basic concepts etc. but they are also so lovable too. I don’t mean to pick on Sesame Street or Peppa the Pig or any of the other children’s shows because my children grew up on them as well, but there may another side to this issue that we may have not considered.

SesameStMuppets

That is, could this means of education also be doing something else to our children’s minds as well? Yes, the children learn things. Useful things of course like the alphabet and numbers, colors etc., but what else comes along with the learning?

Aren’t they also being conditioned to accept TV and in the larger picture, the media as valuable sources of education? Aren’t they being conditioned to accept what they are being offered by the media as valid and valuable?

Ok, it is worthwhile content, but as we know not All of what the media offers is worthwhile or truthful for that matter. We also know that TV induces a trance like state and is an excellent medium for conditioning one’s mind. (If you have ever try to get your children’s attention away from a program they are engaged in, you’ll know what I mean.) However, the belief that TV and the media is educational, valid and thereby truthful is being implanted in the facile mind of the child as they watch their favorite TV characters convey their educational (and conceptual) information.

A Little Further on Down the Road

Generations later politicians are paraded before us on the “tube”. When appear on the tube or in public, they are treated like rock stars. The audience bursts into applause and fawningly……..places their trust and control over their lives in them. (See Psalm 146:3-4 for another view of our modern day Princes.)

Meanwhile, these guys and gals are legislating away our freedoms and creating a modern day panopticon as we see in more full blossom in Britain these days.

So then, why are we applauding them? Why are we practically bowing in deference to them? They are, after all, public servants right? Aren’t they elected to serve us and not vice versa? Yet, we treat them like modern day Princes or, in the case of the President, perhaps a King or Dictator? Criticize the President and for the true believer, it is off with your head! How dare you!

Is There a Connection?

I suggest that there is a connection between the educational TV of our childhoods and the celebrity status of our politicians. The media after all encourages us to view them as our saviors. (Not Jesus of course. Who, after all, elected him?) We fawn over them on talk TV appearances as though they were our best friends only out to supply the answers and goods to meet our most important needs.

But really, let’s be honest here, are they?

They have run up our national debt to unprecedented levels. The latest debacle is the move to have the debt ceiling lifted to watch debt rise $339 Billion in one day! Is this really in our best interests?

Wars these days are constant companions and the military are applauded like the politicians. The unending war on terrorism drags on. (Just like Orwell’s 1984 Socialist Big Brother society where the wars never ended in fact.)  This, of course, serves as an unending source of new debt which feeds the Federal Reserve cartel. They, in turn, provide the funds to put our modern day Princes in office. One hand washes the other as the saying goes.

Yet, we ignore the realities surrounding us and like the proverbial frog in the pot are passively allowing the water to come to a boil, applauding our slave masters all the way.

An Inordinate Trust of the Media?

I suggest that it links back to good old Big Bird, Bert and Ernie and friends. If you watch Presidential elections with a sense of objectivity (That is, not subscribing to media generated labels like conservative/liberal, right wing/left wing or even Republican and Democrat.) you find yourself a bit amazed that the public can so readily lap up the images that the media carefully crafts about the candidates.

The media essentially label the so-called “front runners”. We accept their labels without protest.

They craft the image of a closet Marxist like Obama as “The Change We Need”. The public laps it up hook, line and sinker. Anyone daring to criticize or question his moves may be slapped with the “racist” label, a silly posture that some fools still accept as valid.

Maybe in place of accepting authority and particularly the media, we should first recognize it as the monopoly that it is. Note how it is run by massive Corporations. Educate ourselves and discern how it absolutely fails to convey the real truth?

I think Big Bird has engendered us all with a too generous sense of trust of the media and authority. One that is steadily locking us into a police state panopticon in which it will be acceptable to have Big Brother watching our every move.

Just a Suggestion

If you have children, take responsibility for their basic education. (In fact, with the indoctrination system of public education you may want to take that a step further than the basics. Home schooling perchance? A tough way to fly in today’s economy but your children’s minds may be worth the sacrifice.)

Get a few children’s books and teach them how to recognize the alphabet, colors, numbers etc. themselves. Don’t just plop them in front of the TV and allow them to be subject to the trance state acceptance of the media as your replacement and their bestus friend.

Control the input of what goes into their minds. Maybe they won’t know who Peppa the pig is or Big Bird or the Count. But hey, as the popular commercial once put it, the mind a terrible thing to waste.

 

 

 

How the New World Order is Being Built and Who is Profiting- A Brief Example

The family that plays together stays together as the saying goes. So it is with the Corporate and ultra rich elite who are building their New World Order (NWO) ostensibly for world peace but actually to make us all their wage slaves or slaves of the State under one global government.

One of the big players in building the NWO is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) through their Corporate Member List and Membership Roster. You will find all of the “too big to fail” banks on the CFR Corporate list. You will also find significant key members of government (like our current Secretary of State and Chairwoman of the Federal Reserve for example)

Of course, the media is a player (like Rupert Murdoch and his company News Corp- both members) and many of the so-called experts used by the media to comment on important foreign policy issues, particularly those involving war related issues.

War is a Racket

War is a key tool in constructing the New World Order arsenal BTW. Listen to a reading of Smedley Butler’s short book War is a Racket on YouTube for a sense of why this is. I think you’ll connect the dots easily enough. Some people profit mightily and regularly these days from war. Gee, I wonder why that may be a reason it is so revered by our Corporate owned entertainment and sports venues?

Back to Our Regularly Scheduled Program

Anyway…recently I was breezing through cfr.org and looking at the Corporate list. I noted a new Corporate name that I had not seen before. The first company name on the Corporate list in fact- The Abraaj Group.  I have followed the CFR for a while now but never noticed this Corporate member before. And they were listed as a “Founder” as well which is the highest level of Corporate membership.

Alrighty then, since I never heard of them before and being the curious person that I am, I had to do a little digging to see “whaddup” as the phrase goes.

So…Just Who is The Abraaj Group?

First of all, they are a fairly new player on the scene. They have been around only since 2002. Kind of odd that a relative “newbie” would be on the CFR Founders list. Obviously, the term “Founders” is purchasable and not really a description of actual “Founders”. Guess they just paid more than many of the others making them a bigger “player” on the CFR scene.

They are a private equity (PE) firm which means that they raise money from Limited Partners (LPs) like pension and retirement funds, endowments, insurance companies, and wealthy individuals. Then, using their expertise and “due diligence” invest it for profit.

The end goal for PE firms is to exit their investments at a substantial profit. Typically, according to Bloomberg Business, with Abraaj the exit occurs between 3-5 years after the original investment. It could be shorter or longer depending on the market and favorable economic circumstances.

In short, they essentially take other peoples money (possibly their own as well since none of them appear to be destitute and they are listed as clients too.) and invest it for a profit both for themselves and the investors. I would also expect that there may be some other purposes as well for the investments, such as control and power of an area.

They Grew Pretty Fast Too!

The Abraaj Group has made 140 investments over the past 10 years in about 30 countries and currently has about $9 Billion worth of assets under management.  For a firm that has been around only a decade, that’s quite a growth curve

They concentrate most of their investments in Africa, Asia and South America.

Their top dog is Islamic as are 9 of their 14 partners. The remainder are mainly Indian, with a Latin American for the South American investments of course and a Brit Tom Speechly. I wasn’t able to determine if he was a member of Brit based Chatham House [The RIIA]. It wouldn’t surprise me if he was since Abraaj is a donor to Chatham House as well.

The reason I suspect Chatham House/RIIA is because it is a sister organization of the CFR. The WIKI article linked above notes that or read Shadows of Power by James Perloff, the definitive book on the history and purposes of the CFR. They were formed in Paris at the same time as the CFR. They concentrate on the same areas as does the CFR.

Their Strategic Partners (AKA clients)

According to the World Economic Forum (another NWO lover), the Abraaj Group has some interesting clients (AKA strategic partners).  They comprise 100 leading global companies. (Global being the operative give away word there in case ya missed it.) Bill and Melinda Gates are investors. You know, the pro-vaccine and anti-population growth dude- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjj4Iq-rsNg

Of course, there are a good number of CFR Corporate members on the list as well such as Barclays, Bank of America, Chevron, Credit Suisse and the list goes on. Obviously, one hand washes the other when it comes to investing in Africa, South America and Asia. (There is a growing “red” governmental model in all of these areas but that is another can of worms but worth noting for the tie ins. The New World Order prefers a State dominated authoritarian model like the Communist one. Much easier to control the populace under the systematic application of tyranny as in the Communist model.

These Facts Brings Some Questions To Mind

Why is such an obvious connection to the Middle East and Islam so highly placed on the CFR Corporate list? They are only 10 years old and yet are already “founders” members of the CFR, donors to Chatham House/RIIA as well. After all, the CFR often supplies the experts who are called upon to comment on the war on terrorism and always take an aggressive stance on fighting terrorism encouraging more U.S. involvement in the Middle East. Are these, as Smedley Butler implies, privateers pursuing profit on an opportunistic basis?

The CFR is encouraging war in the Middle East ostensibly to “keep us safe”. (Are we really any safer from “radical Islamist’s” from all of this “war on terror”? Might want to consult the Parisians on that topic these days.)

On the other hand, an organization that is pushing aggressive policies towards the war on terror has at the top of its Corporate list a bunch of rich Islamists who are investing private funds from their Corporate members a good number of whom are members of the CFR.

I mean, why bite the hand that feeds you right? Even if they are Islamic and well, without going into a great deal of detail in this article, part of the problem. At least, according to the neo-cons from the CFR who pushed the war on terror such as Cheney, Richard Perle, Wolfowitz and significant CFR others.

One could see this as a disconnect, but personally I just see it as part of the globalist agenda. Disrupt the countries, establish new leadership more favorable to the NWO plan (Kings and powerful singular figures are not. One person in control can say no more easily than a so-called “Democracy”. Note how singular leaders have either been eliminated or are being attacked. Think that is an accident?), then profit on the rebuilding of third world infrastructure, some of it the product of wars.

After All….

Hey, the ultra wealthy family that manipulates, crushes and destroys plays together afterwards to profit handily working cooperatively with the so-called “enemies”? Nothing like good old family values huh? That is, Corporations and profits far outweigh national loyalty and truth.

The rich continue to get richer and more controlling and Islamic Abraaj gets a nice piece of the pie from its CFR investor buds to boot. Pretty sweet huh? Forget the fact that Americans are infidels and your innocent civilian “Islamic brothers and sisters” caught in the crossfire are dying.

After all, in about 12 years, they went from “zero” to $9 Billion in assets under control or “hero” in the CFR realm of operation. That’s Billion with a “B” BTW (One million seconds is 12 days. One billion seconds is 31 years. And to give you an idea of just how large our $18.6 Trillion national debt actually is: one trillion seconds is 31,000 years! Multiply that by 18.6!! Hope it doesn’t take us that long to pay it all back.)

War really is a racket isn’t it? Good for replacing old orders with a New World Order ya know. Disrupt and disorganize and then “mould it nearer to the hearts desire.”

Fabian Socialist Window

Fabian Socialist Window “Mould It Nearer to the Heart’s Desire”

P.S.- Especially, if it’s got CFR stamped on it. Is it any wonder that they drum up one war after another?

Related articles

The Foolish Right and Left Wing Paradigms – Deception Through the Media

A recent post on a Survivor oriented blog reminded me of how thoroughly people have been misled by the media. After an article entitled Hacking the News, which depicted the press as being sold-out to liberalism, a reader posted the following response:

“This writer is delusional in his assessment of “liberal” news reporting and the attitudes of the people who get news from so-called “liberal” news outlets.

The truth is that such alarmist headlines and “tweets” are the norm for CONSERVATIVE news outlets, such as Alex Jones and “Before it’s the News.”

If people are misinformed it is much more likely to be from a “Right Wing Conservative” news source, such as FOX.”

To me, this is yet another example of how deceived the public is by mainstream media into accepting labels and neat little boxes for their realities while missing the overall.

All the Same Team

The so-called “right wing” news station of Fox is on the same team as the rest of the media. Fox is part of the News Corp conglomerate owned by Rupert Murdoch, who is a long-time member of the globalist oriented, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR is a bankster created organization that pushes globalism and a one world government goal which has all of the “tooShadows_of_Power
big to fail” banks and David C. Rockefeller as its Honorary Chairman. (For more on them read Shadows of Power by James Perloff).

This so-called “right wing” is simply controlled opposition that exists to present a counterpoint to the main narrative in the media. It’s overall intent is to move the people towards the intentional goal of one world government. You will note that on both sides of the message, war as a solution remains intact.

The War Agenda is Rarely Questioned By the Mainstream

The Fox neo-cons push war because war aids in generating debt which is important for the international banking cartel represented by the Federal Reserve (see Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin) and also aids the wealthy elite who control banking and our media to gain both economic and political control over nations. Debt enslaves one to whom the debt is owed. That includes nations, not just individuals.

Left-Right? What is the Real Difference?

Fact is, the left pushes the same message. How much change in war oriented activities has there been since Obama took office? Try none! In fact, we have been involved in more wars than even under Bush with the continuation of Iraq to this day (while lessened under the same time frame as Bush proposed) and escalated in Afghanistan as well as involvement in Arab Spring revolutions, Libya and others.

There is no real difference between the so-called left and rights, liberal-conservative etc. There is rather a false emphasis of difference to produce the illusion of right and left or difference.

The Real End Game

In the end, we continue to be led towards their overall paradigm of one world government. People who buy into one “side” or the other of the false left-right, Democrat-Republican, right wing-left wing models are simply a pack of suckers falling prey to their propaganda machines controlled by fiat currency issued by a now global central banking scheme.

The global war on terrorism continues and banks hold the debt and control that results.

The Will Rogers Solution

Will Rogers

Will Rogers- 1879 to 1935

One way of ending this game was proposed, tongue in cheek, by the great American humorist of the 20’s and 30’s Will Rogers. Will said:

“I have a scheme for stopping war. It’s this- no nation is allowed to enter a war until they have paid for the last one.”

The Debt Solution

You can guarantee Will’s solution would never see the light of day. Debt is how they control and enslave nations and their people.

Politicians cannot get elected without it. Wars cannot be conducted without it. Corporations cannot operate without it, especially the largest ones. People as a whole are mired in it including the mortgage on that house you think is yours, unless you fail to pay it, that is. Guess who owns your house then.

Debt is promoted over savings continuously. In the end, it is the holder of the debt that controls the one who owes the debt.

War is one of the most effective ways to promote national debt. The holder of the debt is the nation. The one to whom it is owed is the international banking cartels which operate under the paradigm of central banks. (See The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin for details)

People are in fact simply misinformed by all of the media and it is by no means an accident. It is simply easier to accept what you are fed without questioning it. In the end, we all end up under the thumbs of the international financiers and their minions.

Media Spin Means Control

The articles below demonstrate some of the deception and how effectively people are controlled by the media. Instead of questioning the media, most people simply accept its spin and comment on it as though it is the word of God. It is deception at its finest. Few understand or acknowledge that even those who think they are so well-informed. It’s deception by omission rolling happily along and few ever notice, until it will be too late that is.

Recommended Reading

Congress Funds Government with More Funny Money- Pt 2

As noted and not really fleshed out by the media or ballyhooed, Congress was supplied with more “funny money” (fiat money from the Federal Reserve created out of nothing) from the Federal Reserve to the tune of $1.1 Trillion.

Very few paid attention to this move and simply passed it off as what should happen to keep our government humming along and our country smoothly operating. Few see the more insidious red flags that this move points to and fewer still understand the system and what it actually is doing here.

Our Built In Normalcy Bias

The fact is this is more major than the public cares to acknowledge, understand and prepare for. Practically all of us have a built in normalcy bias carefully cultivated by our educational systems and the media. So just what is a “normalcy bias”? Definition.net gives a good overview of this term I believe:

In short, a normalcy bias, refers to a mental state people enter when facing a disaster. It causes people to underestimate both the possibility of a disaster occurring and its possible effects.

The assumption that is made in the case of the normalcy bias is that since a disaster never has occurred then it never will occur. It also results in the inability of people to cope with a disaster once it occurs.

People with a normalcy bias have difficulties reacting to something they have not experienced before. People also tend to interpret warnings in the most optimistic way possible, seizing on any ambiguities to infer a less serious situation.

The key in the above definition is the assumption that because a disaster has never occurred during their lifetimes, it will never occur. The reality is that our current prosperity is an illusion produced by a system of modern money mechanics and inevitably destined to fail.

The Signs of Collapse Are Gathering

My son said to me recently.” Yeah Dad, you’ve been talking about this stuff [currency collapse] since I was a kid.” And yes, that is true. I have been following this issue of our money supply for over a decade now. Frankly, I am surprised that we haven’t progressed faster towards collapse than we have. After all, the Federal Reserve has been manipulating our economy for over a century now.

But there are signs that the storm is gathering clouds quickly now.

Pay attention for example to the prices of food and goods in our society. Prices are rising and rising more steadily these days. Meals that cost $4 in local Chinese restaurants less than a decade ago are now up above $8 and higher. A doubling in under a decade. Other doublings have occurred in many other foods.

I recently traveled on the turnpike and noticed that tolls which had just been bumped up significantly less than a year ago were going up again. The notice was posted for another increase on January 1st. Gas costs are going down. Why the increase I wondered?

I asked the toll taker what the increase was going to be. After he claimed ignorance, I researched it a bit myself and discovered that it was going to be 25% more! That amounts to a doubling of tolls in under 7 years.

Inflation is a Hidden Tax and Sign of Declining Currency

When more dollars are pumped into the economy and production of goods and services does not produce those dollars, the value of the currency declines. As noted in Modern Money Mechanics put out by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in the first post on this topic, control of the money supply is essential to keep the value stable.

Our government just increased the money supply with no subsequent increase in goods and services to the tune of $1.1 Trillion. The value of our money will decline further because the same amount of goods and services are in the economy but now there are more dollars chasing them. It will take time to filter through the economy but our purchasing power from money earned has been further compromised.

This means you will work for the same amount of money but it will buy less. This is what G. Edward Griffin refers to as a hidden tax. The value of your earnings has been removed with nary a whimper or protest. The government won’t feel it with the new money but by the time it reaches us, it will be expanded further through our fractional reserve banking system and worth even less, far less.

Watch this video on YouTube for some education on our debt based money set up and where it is heading.

So, I would also suggest reading or listening to The Creature from Jekyll Island by Edward G. Griffin for a more complete view of the Federal Reserve and solution. The most current version is recommended as it contains important updates.

The Economy is Running on Empty

What the latest move by our government tells us is that our political and economic system is running out of options. Taxes are reaching breaking points so borrowing has been growing as an option for our politicians. With the amount of debt our government has however, even that option is getting risky.

You see, our economy is no longer a production based economy. Our capacities to produce goods have been transferred overseas. We are a credit based economy rather than a export based economy. Our production of goods capacities have been reduced to a shell of what they were during the 50’s and early 60’s by transferring our manufacturing out of the country. (A quick search on our retail shelves for American made goods will clearly validate that last statement.) Consequently, we cannot produce goods to sell to other nations to take in money.

Now, every round of borrowing is driving the value of our currency further down in value. This means that in order to equal what was required previously even more money has to be borrowed since the money is now worth less because of what was previously pumped into the economy without a rise in tangible goods or even services. This has created more dollars but not more goods. This makes the tangible goods and services which come from people’s labor that much more valuable than the money which came from nothing.

A Diamond Analogy

You can think of it this way. Diamonds are valuable not only because they are pretty but also because they are rare. Suppose a beach were discovered that was made up of diamonds rather than sand. What do you suppose would happen to the value of diamonds? Of course, since there are now more diamonds and no more increase in buyers, the diamonds would go down in value.

The same thing happens to our money when there is an increase in money supply but not in the goods and services that money purchases. Money is now less rare or scarce than the goods or services produced by actual labor. So the goods in relation to the money are more scarce. Therefore their prices rise to make up for the cheap money.

This is what we are watching now. Rising prices.

At some point a critical mass is reached. When this happens inflation reaches a hyper inflationary stage. The value of the currency drops markedly and quickly. Money becomes far less valuable and it takes significantly more money to purchase the same goods. Zimbabwe and Chile are modern day examples of this phenomena. The Wiemar Republic is a common example which was the state of Germany after WWI.

One Last Thing…

On top of the decrease in manufacturing and increased borrowing and debt there is another insidious little action that is continuing- War. War is one of the best ways to fuel inflation. War is first of all, expensive. It produces massive and continuous debt.

Secondly, the goods produced get destroyed. Instead of generating new goods or services that could generate more production, they end up being eliminated. As they are eliminated, what is left behind is more debt and no means to pay for it with the sale of more goods. There is simply more demand for more goods that are destined to get destroyed leaving behind even more debt.

Can you detect the vicious cycle war creates? I hope so because if you do a little investigation of history you will note that over time the most common accompanying reason for the collapse of an empire was war and the debt it created that came along with it.

It doesn’t bode well for the direction of our nation. Empire ultimately results in collapse. It always has and it always will. For as Jesus said to Peter when he cut the servants ear off in Matthew 26:52 “Put up again thy sword into its place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.”

So, while our Corporate controlled media who are controlled by their money masters that keep them supplied with loans and cash flow use its mouthpieces to continuously endorse the value of war, our economy is further eroded by the subsequent produced.

What Can Be Done?

First of all, education on how our system is leading us in the wrong direction is essential. Then, keeping in mind this wrong direction take some precautions to protect yourself.

If paper money collapses, all assets based on it will collapse as well. Investments based on inflation will become worthless. Think: paper money and paper assets like stocks or paper based assets. That is where tangible assets will become valuable including universally accepted exchangeable assets like gold and silver. (Silver may be even more valuable because of its useful commercial values.)

If inflation strikes hard, necessities like food will skyrocket in price. You may want to take some steps to prepare for that real possibility by storing some basics with long term intent in mind. Since that is a whole other can of worms I will not cover much on that here but will recommend a few resources below to get you started.

At any rate, the worst thing you can do is nothing. As the saying goes, the dumbest thing to do is to continue to sit in the middle of the tracks with an onrushing train bearing down on you. The handwriting is on the wall as King Belshazzar in Daniel Chapter 5 discovered to his dismay predicting downfall. We don’t need a prophet to interpret it. Simply logic and a little patient study of history and honest money.

 

 

Suggested Reading

How the Federal Government Contributes to Diabetes and Obesity

Most people want to believe that their government is there to protect them from harm. Throw in the conditioning to trust authority which begins and continues throughout the State sponsored “free” education system and trust in the government is a conditioned a response for a good many of us.

Isn’t Our Health Our Responsibility?

So, how can I make a statement like the title above? How could the government possibly contribute to creating a disease as terrible as diabetes and an epidemic level of obesity? I mean, isn’t that the responsibility of each individual? Aren’t we primarily responsible for our own level of health?

Well, ultimately the answer to that question would be yes. On the other hand. are we really actually encouraged to take responsibility for our health or is there an emphasis on using the health care system instead of our own individual selections?

Well, I think Obamacare pretty much answers that question. After all, the Federal government now has made it illegal to not participate in the chemically driven, surgically oriented modern medical system.

A system that encourages dependence on “experts” not ourselves. A system that dispenses expensive chemicals as an answer from a simple headache or common cold to Cancer, Heart Disease or Diabetes. A system that is very costly and has morphed into the most costly system ever in the history of the planet while failing to provide effective solutions to deadly diseases like the three mentioned above.

Enter the Dragon

King Corn

Vimeo Version Below is 10 Minutes Short But Captures Most Important Info

So why all this involvement in our health care system from the Federal government? Is it really in the interests of the public or in the interests of vested interests? Could the medical monopoly that Obamacare promotes be tied in with the medical monopoly of Big Pharma and major insurance firms? I think most of us can see this connection without too much forethought. However, could there also be another more insidious factor operating here? One hidden behind the scenes and never brought to light? A dragon like Smaug of The Hobbit, hidden in a lair protecting his treasure? A dragon named King Corn?

King Corn

King Corn is the name of a documentary made a few years ago by two recent college graduates who wanted to find out about how we eat. They started out with a hair analysis and were told that most of their body was made from corn. Corn? What the…? The remainder of the film follows the two college buddies, Ian Cheney and Curt Ellis, as they set out to learn more about corn—how it’s grown, and how it ends up in so many of our foods.

They do so by moving from Boston to Iowa and making arrangements to grow an acre of corn they rent from a local farmer. (Turns out they both had relatives from 3 generations back that were from the same town in Iowa they used in the film. Something neither had known when they became friends.) The film traces each step of corn growth and fills in the blanks along the way.

What King Corn Tells Us

First of all, we learn that without government subsidies corn farmers would lose money. Ian and Curt find this out in the end when their $28 subsidy takes them from loss to profit. They also discover other subsidies they never even knew about as well. In fact, Ian and Curt tell us:

  • Over the past 15 years, taxpayers have paid corn farmers more than $77 billion in subsidies
  • More than 75 percent of farm subsidies are paid to a mere 10 percent of America’s farmers
  • Since the late 1970s, the real price of fruits and vegetables have risen by 30 percent, while the price for soda has decreased by 34 percent

Now, why has soda gone down while fruits and vegetables have risen? The answer- HFCS or high fructose corn syrup from the gigantic excesses of corn made possible by government subsidy as noted in the film. So, what impact has this had on our society. A report from the Journal of Clinical Nutrition entitled “Fructose, weight gain, and the insulin resistance syndrome” concludes:

In terms of feedback to the CNS regarding energy status in peripheral tissues, fructose consumption results in decreased production and, therefore, decreased signaling to the CNS from 2 hormones (leptin and insulin) involved in the long-term regulation of energy homeostasis and body adiposity. The same observation applies to dietary fat. Thus, the long-term consumption of diets high in fat and fructose is likely to lead to increased energy intake, weight gain, and obesity. The potential for weight gain from increased fructose consumption may only represent one aspect of its metabolic consequences.

While the potential for weight gain is one aspect, the film covers another.

A Brooklyn cab driver was interviewed who said he lost a third of his over 300 lbs. just by stopping the consumption of HFCS sweetened soda! The Hispanic driver goes on to relate a list of relatives in his family lost to diabetes, including his father.

A subsequent interview at a local clinic in Brooklyn reveals that low cost, fast food among the community (much of it made possible by subsidized cheap corn) is a big contributor to the diabetes epidemic particularly in low income communities.

Apples to Twinkies

According to a report by the U.S. Public Information Research Group (U.S. PIRG) entitled Apples to Twinkies:

At a time when America faces high obesity rates and tough federal budget choices, taxpayer dollars are funding the production of junk food ingredients. Since 1995, the government has spent $292.5 billion on agricultural subsidies, $19.2 billion of which have subsidized corn- and soy-derived junk food ingredients.

And what are the impacts of these government subsidies?

  • In 2013, taxpayers spent $84.4 billion on corn production, $8.1 billion of which funded production of corn starch and sweeteners.
  • The subsidies are directed towards the very largest commercial farms with 62% of the farmers receiving no subsidy at all.
  • Over 31 percent of the adolescent population is now overweight or obese with estimates of obesity-related medical costs reaching $150 billion per year.

According to the Center for Disease Control, one of the primary recommendations in conditions of pre-diabetes is to lose weight.

Another Unacknowledged Impact

Our Federal subsidies while lowering our cost of corn has virtually destroyed the Mexican corn market. An article written by the Acton Institute notes:

The 2003 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) deregulated all agricultural trade, except for corn and dairy products. The Mexican government complains that since NAFTA’s initial implementation in 1994, the United States has raised farm subsidies by 300 percent. As a result, Mexican corn farmers, who comprise the majority of the country’s agricultural sector, experienced drastic declines in the domestic price of their product. It should come as no surprise, then, that the United States began to experience an influx of Mexicans looking for employment in the latter half of the 1990s.

Of course, there are other factors influencing immigration but corn farming which once was important in Mexico is now a shell of what it once was. Once known for their wide variety of corn as noted by the film corn varieties have been reduced markedly to primarily yellow dent high in starch and low in protein.

But Wait There’s More

Additionally, the corn used in production from government subsidy is almost entirely the GMO variety engineered to accept toxic pesticides. Pesticides which end up in our food chain and our bodies. Now, they are discovering that this GMO corn while resistant to pesticides is not strong enough to resist pests.

Corn grown on soil that is artificially fertilized also lacks the minerals found in organic soils. If the minerals are not in the soil, they will not be in the plant and ultimately our bodies. Minerals that are important catalysts for metabolic actions and important to our long term health.

Government Collusion

So, is government a contributor to our epidemic of obesity, diabetes and poor health as noted in my title? Personally, I think the facts speak for themselves.

The collusion of government and Corporate interests is clear. Subsidies go primarily to Agribusiness, the largest Corporate owned farms. Corn is grown from taxpayer money for profit not health. The end result is an excess of cheap corn that makes profitable but damaging sweeteners that are heavily marketed to the population with slick commercials with the only motive being profit.

Is Cheap Corn Really Cheap?

Of course, ignored in all of this is the fact that the corn is not nearly as cheap as the market price reflects. It is only cheap because the government subsidizes it which we all pay for through increased taxation and the insidiously hidden tax of inflation caused by the growth of government debt from the increased money supply of money from nothing.

So while the corn is cheap, the money used to subsidize it (over a quarter of a Trillion $ in the last 2 decades for all agricultural subsidies) has inflated the dollar by lowering its purchasing power.

Additionally, the health of the American public suffers as obesity, diabetes and other diseases rise. Not to worry. Now, we have all been forced into a system of expensive health care pushing the products of a minority of pharmaceutical firms with steadily rising costs.

Cheap corn, not what it is cracked up to be? I think so.

Oh, and one last thing. Are government subsidies for private businesses Constitutional? I think not.

 

Congress Funds Government with More Funny Money- Banks Get Free Bailout Pass in Return

If you don’t get it by now, this should help solidify who is really running the show in our nation. While Congress passed a $1.1 Trillion spending bill to keep itself running Congress included a provision that does nothing more than give a free pass to further bail-outs of the “too big to fails” in a case of one hand washes the other.

Money from Nothing Doesn’t Come Free

The Federal Reserve fiat funny money that is generated from nowhere doesn’t come free. Citibank and the other “too big to fails”, which are among the Primary Dealers that handle the T-bills and bond transactions that create the money from nothing that the Federal Reserve generates, have now legally been given a free pass to speculate on the taxpayer’s dime.

If their speculations fail, the taxpayer is now liable to pay for their losses. In other words, if they gamble and lose, we pay for their losses. The banks win. We the people, lose.

Only a Few Senators Openly Opposed the Move

The provision, written by Citibank according to Elizabeth Warren, was opposed by only a few in the Senate. Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Republican Sen. David Vitter voiced opposition to the provision tacked on to the spending bill. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., joined Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., on an amendment to remove the provision from the government funding bill, they say allows taxpayer bailouts to financial institutions that engage in risky derivative trading. It didn’t matter. The supposedly “conservative” Republicans joined hands in ignoring it and passing the spending bill with it attached anyway.

Warren and Vitter both agreed it was wrong for Congress to add a last-minute provision to a spending bill allowing derivative trading to be included in transactions covered by government insurance programs.

“Ever since the new financial regulations went into place, Wall Street has been working behind the scenes to open another loophole so they could gamble with taxpayer money and get bailed out when their risky bets threaten to blow up our financial system,” Warren said. “Congress should not put taxpayers on the hook for another bailout, and this giveaway that was drafted by Citigroup lobbyists has no place in a critical government funding bill.”

Added Vitter:

“Before Congress starts handing out Christmas presents to the megabanks and Wall Street — we should vote on this bipartisan amendment. We need to remove these risky derivatives that aren’t even necessary for normal banking purposes and would only make future taxpayer funded bailouts more likely.”

So, How Do the Banks Feel About the Move?

The American Banking Association argued that stripping Section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that prohibits federal insurance to financial institutions that engage in certain derivatives activities is the right move.

“The majority of banks, including community banks, that use swaps do so in order to hedge or mitigate risk from their ordinary business activities, including lending.   Hedging and mitigating risk are not only good business practices, but are important tools that banks use to help borrowing customers hedge their own business risks,” said ABA Executive Vice President James Ballentine. “The push-out requirement to move some swaps into separate affiliates makes one-stop shopping impossible for businesses ranging from family farms to energy companies that want to hedge against commodity price changes.”

Why of course, they would feel that way. Heck, who wouldn’t like to go to Atlantic City or Las Vegas on the provision that if they win, they get to keep it, but if they lose someone else foots the bill for their losses.

Is Elizabeth Warren for Real?

I don’t know whether Elizabeth Warren is for real or not. She could be what the Communists use to pass through draconian legislation and gets its system implanted which is to say “controlled opposition”.

In other words, they plant or allow someone to oppose their moves while achieving compromise designed to further the Communist system. It makes the end result more palatable to the citizens who are being enslaved under State tyranny that way. Perhaps Warren is serving that role. We don’t really know.

However, her statements ring true for the majority of us who end up holding the bill here:

“Who does Congress work for?” Warren said in a speech on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon. “Does it work for the millionaires, the billionaires, the giant companies with their armies of lobbyists and lawyers, or does it work for all the people?” […]“Now, the House of Representatives is about to show us the worst of government for the rich and powerful,” she continued. “The House is about to vote on a budget deal, a deal negotiated behind closed doors that slips in a provision that would let derivatives traders on Wall Street gamble with taxpayer money and get bailed out by the government when their risky bets threaten to blow up our financial system.”

Really now though Elizabeth, the handwriting is already on the wall. We are moving ever closer to a Statist government that takes care of their chosen elite and makes “We the People” work for them. But hey, I appreciate your sentiments anyway, even if they are quite obvious by now to anyone with half a brain and paying attention.

So How Does Obama Feel About It?

Well, the man that interrupted his campaign to lobby in front of the House as a Senator in 2008, to pass the bank bailout bill said that if he could write the bill, “I suspect it’d be slightly different.”

President Barack Obama urged senators to approve the spending bill, even though it has provisions he doesn’t like:

“That is not the circumstance we find ourselves in, and I think what the American people very much are looking for is some practical governance and the willingness to compromise.”

Practical Governance? Passing a spending bill that has more dollars in it than there are galaxies in the universe is practical?

Willingness to compromise? You call passing the buck to the public a compromise?

Hey, what do you expect. This is the guy, after all, who gave us “Change We Need” and “Change We Can Believe In”.

Is anyone still a sucker enough to continue believing today? Astoundingly, yes!

End Result

Congress and our government has just acknowledged who their true master is and it ain’t the electorate. It should be clear now who is actually running the show- the Federal Reserve!

They control Congress because they hold the purse strings. Without their funny money, Congress would be out of work today. But they aren’t. Their jobs are secure, for now. I knew they would be.

As for us, we just got handed more inflation which means our spending power will be further watered down. The money we work for will buy less because prices will rise to accommodate more money in circulation without an increase in production of real wealth.

How It Works- According to the Fed Itself

Modern Money Mechanics a publication issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago puts it this way:

In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper, deposits merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face value. What, then, makes these instruments – checks, paper money, and coins – acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so. Money, like anything else, derives its value from its scarcity in relation to its usefulness.

Control of the quantity of money is essential if its value is to be kept stable. Money’s real value can be measured only in terms of what it will buy. Therefore, its value varies inversely with the general level of prices. Assuming a constant rate of use, if the volume of money grows more rapidly than the rate at which the output of real goods and services increases, prices will rise. This will happen because there will be more money than there will be goods and services to spend it on at prevailing prices.

This is straight from the horse’s mouth- the Federal Reserve itself. If you aren’t getting this yet, I suggest you bone up with some of the recommended reading below. You need to wake up and smell the money so you can prepare accordingly. As Tiny Tim said in the Alistair Sim movie at the end- “And God Bless Us All.”

 Related articles

 

Sandy Hook – Two Years After and a Banned YouTube Video

Alex Jones- InfoWars site had a report on a new documentary about Sandy Hook that was banned from YouTube by requests.  Scroll down to Internet Censors Viral Sandy Hook Truth Documentary ) for the report.

Having posted on this topic after the event, questioning its veracity, a claim of a banned video on the topic got my attention. So, I checked it out.

It’s long (almost 3 hours). It delayed during the stream periodically which was annoying. However, it really covered the information effectively and backed it up with facts and references. You can view it here for free: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook.

Topics Covered

Sandy_Hook_Collage

 Interestingly, they didn’t even cover some of the more obvious stuff like the Coroner interview, multiple shooter hypothesis, crisis actor father Robbie, etc. Guess that’s because it has already been covered in depth on YouTube. In fact, I posted on some of this stuff closer to the event over a year ago myself.

However, some of the stuff is so phony that it is downright amusing like the people/parents at the firehouse who are literally leaving the scene, making a right and then re-entering to mill about again (essentially walking in circles).

DNA anomalies have now surfaced which do not demonstrate Adam Lanza on the guns and ammo but rather people supposedly shot at the scene.

Many actors were found throughout the testimonies and their behavior does not demonstrate a crisis mode or tragic event response.

Why no children in the video that supposedly showed the children being evacuated?

Why were 6 ambulances parked at the fire house with their fronts facing away from the school and the access road to the school completely blocked by vehicles?

Evidence on Adam Lanza never demonstrated attendance at Sandy Hook, although CNN and other mainstream media indicated otherwise.

Adam Lanza’s barber? What barber?

Adam Lanza’s brother Ryan was the first accused. What happened to that guy anyway?

How about Daddy Lanza? Why no public interviews with him?

Visual anomalies that do not indicate crisis mode or anything even close and much more

Did Gene Rosen Really Deserve a Song?

Particularly moving was the piece on Gene Rosen, the retired pet sitter, who reputedly found 6 children from Sandy Hook sitting in shock at his home (Or was it 4?). Rosen was built into a kind of folk hero by the media. However, we find out that his account of this event changed 4 times and that he was also an actor.

Turns out the guy was seen in videos of the crowd at the school when he was supposed to be at his home tending to the forlorn children. He was also a known actor and  the most embarrassing disclosure is a video of him posted where he appears to be practicing his lines and was corrected by the camera man.

The Gene Rosen Song- Excerpted Lyrics

“You need way more room because you’re heart’s too big for your house.

Gene Rosen…….Gene Rosen

Roses bloom and Elm Trees sway for what you did that fateful day.”

Sorry, but this is simply farcical. Is this singer for real or is this actually a tongue in cheek parody? After seeing the evidence about Gene you may feel differently about this little ditty.

What Was Sandy Hook Really About?

To me, Sandy Hook, looks like another false flag, engineered event that was used to generate support for more gun control legislation and ultimately more control over the public. It appears to be a drill that was trumped up into an actual event. Of course, the mention of this will bring on abuse from the true believers. After all, one of the purposes of any conspiracy is to convince you that conspiracy does not, in fact, exist.

 Summary

The film was long (Delayed its streaming for me when I viewed it. It may not do the same for you. Don’t know. But I soldiered through it because it was NOT the same old stuff on the topic.), but very revealing. It raises issues that have not been effectively addressed in the past and puts them in one convenient location- this documentary. I found quite interesting overall and would recommend you view it and make up your own mind.