The general practice of aborting unborn babies diagnosed with birth defects has nearly eliminated Down’s Syndrome in Iceland with Denmark close behind it.
This came out during a debate in Ireland on abortion in which it was mentioned that it was the stated policy of the Denmark government “to eradicate Down Syndrome by abortion by 2030″
Denmark’s Irish ambassador Carsten Sondergaard objected insisting that Denmark only allows abortions up to 12 weeks without reason.
After that period of time you need permission to eliminate the unborn child.
While Sondergaard insisted that “the existence of Down’s Syndrome in the child is not sufficient to get the abortion”, he also added that in 2016 there were only four children born in Denmark with Down’s Syndrome after prenatal diagnosis.
He further clarified:
In general it should be noted that it is not the policy of the Danish health authorities to eradicate Down’s Syndrome, but it is their duty to provide the pregnant woman with the best possible basis for her to make her own decision about her pregnancy.
As noted in an article on this issue appearing in the New American online on Friday, December 8th :
According to a 2011 study in the Journal of American Medical Genetics, 99 percent of parents who have a child with Down’s syndrome report being happy with them.
And the rates of divorce for families with a Down’s syndrome child are actually lower than those without any disabled children, as well as those with children who have other disabilities, a 2008 Vanderbilt University study shows.
Denmark is a decidedly socialist nation. Since socialism is not paid for by the government, but the people, it follows that they also have the highest taxes in the world.
As one would also expect in a socialist state, equality is a very important value in Denmark. Equality however, is an idea – an ideal, not a human life.
Unfortunately, it appears that unborn babies with defects don’t meet the ideal. Consequently, for the sake on an idea, they are to be eliminated. They call this “humanism” by the way.
This practice hearkens back to the tactics of the Nazi (National Socialist Party) under Hitler.
Persons considered defective in their society were either eliminated or isolated in “asylums” which were more like concentration camps. The society had to be cleansed of defectives to meet the ideal of racial perfection for the national socialist nation, which would lead to the dominance of the “master race”.
Is this practice in Denmark perhaps yet another way for Marxist inspired secular societies and governments to contribute to the breakdown of the family unit, while strengthening the power of the State over its citizens?
Suppose there were a way to determine if there were a Marxist socialist marker in a baby? We developed somehow, the capacity to determine beforehand the inclination of the unborn child to grow up to become a staunch supporter of the socialist model.
With that knowledge coupled with the evidence of the huge number of deaths that Marxist socialism has produced on the planet, we could then eliminate them before birth. This would eliminate the historically validated blot of the Marxist socialist upon the planet before it had an opportunity to do damage. thereby saving millions of lives.
For example, imagine how many lives could have been saved if we had used this test to terminate the births of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro and Kim Jun Il for starters.
Just eliminating that group alone would have saved about 160 million lives give or take a million. Four times more than all the wars over the same time period, not to mention that some of those socialist nations were perpetrators of those wars as well.
Meanwhile, the progression of socialism in Denmark appears to be ironically leading them toward Hitlerian “advancements”. What goes around comes around as the saying goes.
Denmark was a target of a Nazi Germany takeover during WWII. Unfortunately, it appears they are drifting towards the same mentality as the Nazi’s held. A natural result it appears as they have embraced the same ideology held by the Nazi’s- national socialism.
What exactly are the goals of this practice of eliminating these harmless and often times very loving, Downs syndrome children? Apparently, the State believes it is killing two birds with one stone.
First of all, it is saving money. In place of raising the child or “useless eater”, they simply snuff them out before the “problem” arises.
Additionally, this act serves to promote the power of the State over the lives of its citizens, unfortunately encouraging the growth of even more Hitler-like policies.
I suppose in the socialist state this is called progress.
I just hope that our nation doesn’t decline to these barbaric standards of playing secular God with unborn children.
Unfortunately, when Marxist socialist idealism continues to grow, human life is at risk in any nation.
An ordinary citizen with well over a decade of study devoted to uncovering the truth about government and authorities.Deception is fostered by the omission of key information, background or facts. This is an important way in which your mind is being controlled. Whatever entity controls your mental frame also controls your life.Filling in the background and gaps helps you understand the impact and intent of government/authorities on your life, Better informed, you will take more meaningful actions to help restore your lost freedoms
Twitter De-Platforms Conservatives and Patriots – Yet Still Allows Terrorist Accounts – 16 House Republicans Send Them a Letter
Typhus Carrying Rats in LA Among the Piles of Trash Shows That “Progressivism” Apparently Leads to Progressive Decline
House Democrats Casually Toss God In the Waste Bin During Witness Swear In Ceremony
Sanctuary City Philly Suspends the Use of “God Bless America” Song – Claim It’s Songstress Was a Racist
Omar Offends the Public with Her 911 Remarks- Pelosi’s Response? Blame Donald Trump
How the Left Has Redefined Science to Make It “Politically Correct” – Part Three
How the Left Has Redefined Science to Make It “Politically Correct” – Part Two
A Real-Life Comparison of Two Woman’s 2019 Marches- Pro-Life Versus Woman’s March
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.