In the final presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, Hillary was finally asked about the WikiLeaks disclosures over the past few weeks to which Donald replied, “Thank you” BTW. I felt the same since the media has proven itself to be more heavily biased against any other candidate of any other election including, to my surprise, Ron Paul in the last election.
They would rather keep the public focused on social dirt than real issues that impact us directly such as the sovereignty of our nation. After all, without borders, there is no nation is there?
So, let’s take a closer look at exactly what Hillary was asked and exactly at how she responded and what it means.
Chris Wallace, by far the best moderator on any of the three debates, specifically asked Hillary, during the segment about immigration and borders the following:
After Trump’s “Thank you” and interruption from the audience, Wallace continued, “So that’s the question. Please, quiet, everybody. Is that your dream, open borders?”
But you are very clearly quoting from WikiLeaks and what’s really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans. They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions, then they have given that information to WikiLeaks for the purpose of putting it on the Internet. This has come from the highest levels of the Russian government, clearly from Putin himself, in an effort — as 17 of our intelligence agencies have confirmed — to influence our election.
So I actually think the most important question of this evening, Chris, is finally will Donald Trump admit and condemn that the Russians are doing this and make it clear that he will not have the help of Putin in this election, that he rejects Russian espionage against Americans which he actually encouraged in the past?
Those are the questions we need answered. We’ve never had anything like this happen in any of our elections before.
As we will see this is nothing less than a red herring dodge, deflection from the real question and obfuscation of what she actually said.
And in case you think this statement is taken out of context, watch this YouTube video of Hillary as First Lady fawning over former Council on Foreign Relations member, Walter Kronkite, on his receipt of his global governance award from the then existing World Federalist Association now called the Citizens for Global Solutions.
Donald called Hillary’s evasive non-answer as “a great pivot off the fact that she wants open borders” and asked, “How did we get off to Putin?”
Any objective viewer, not just those who are Trump supporters, would agree.
Instead of answering the question directly (and honestly I may add), Clinton essentially said that her getting caught with her hand in the cookie jar is irrelevant because what is really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government (AKA as Putin the supposed BFF of Donald according to Hillary) has engaged in espionage against Americans.
This is what is called “preparation by Hillary” BTW. Spin and deflection rather than facts. So, let’s take a closer look at what Hillary actually said and what it actually means after a bit of context to her remarks.
Who is Banco Itau?
This speech, for which Hillary was paid $225,000, was given to Banco Itau which is Latin America’s largest Corporate & Investment Bank. They are part of the Itaú Unibanco group, one of the world’s largest financial conglomerates. In other words, she was speaking to the financial elite of Latin America- a decidedly Leftist hemisphere to be honest.
Hillary’s Actual Statement to Banco Itau
This what Hillary actually said in her speech to this banking elite audience:
Let’s unpack her statement.
Hillary told this major foreign bank that her “dream” was “a hemispheric common market.” If she stopped here, this statement stands alone.
She could have simply stated, “My dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.” and her statement would have made complete sense.
However, she went on to embellish her dream and add features that would be included in her “dream” as follows:
- Her dream would arrive sometime in the future. In other words, it is something she is working towards. A new world order perhaps?
- Her dream would include open trade and open borders. In short, this is an encapsulation of the New World Order which high level politicians like her husband, George Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Henry Kissinger, and other puppets of the financial elite have mentioned numerous times in the past.
- Her dream would include green, sustainable, energy. Incidentally, can you imagine cities like Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas etc. being powered on “green energy” alone? If yes, may I offer you a bridge in Brooklyn for sale real cheap ‘cause you just qualified as a prime customer?
A hemispheric common market would create growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.
Now, this is a highly questionable conclusion to say the least.
In every case when government has over stepped limited boundaries and grown to have power over the people rather than the reverse (We’re talking the actual results Communism has produced everywhere it has been applied.), the persons under such a scenario have experienced tyranny and poverty, not growth and opportunity.
For the elites, like Hillary, in control however- the results are exactly the opposite. They end up with growth and opportunity- not every person. Of course, when talking to a group of banking elites that conclusion is understood. They all share the same dream.
Not About Green Energy
In short, Hillary’s claim that her statement was about green energy is patently false. As is obvious when we dissect her statement, green energy was an embellishment of her dream of a new world order or a “hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.”
The dream was a new world order. Green energy was part of it, not what the dream is actually about.
The statement she made at Banco Itau actually reveals Hillary’s true colors which is why she nearly immediately threw out the red herring about Russian espionage and influence on our election.
What It Means
To be clear, open borders means no nation. This is no small thing. Eliminate borders and what do you have? The answer is pretty clear- no nation and potentially no law and order as well.
So, in place of anarchy, chaos and law of the jungle as is said, what can be used to fill the vacuum to establish order?
Well then, how about a global government? This New World Order thingy political elites like her husband and others have referred to repeatedly in the past.
As noted above, when government controls the masses, the end result has always been tyranny and poverty not freedom and prosperity.
Why the Opposite?
Why does a spread of government produce tyranny and poverty rather than freedom and prosperity?
As Lord Acton in the middle of the 19th Century stated:
The more absolute the power, the greater the corruption. This new world order would likely result in absolute tyranny despite Hillary’s claims of “growth and opportunity for every person”.
To take it a step further I would submit that the reason for that result can be found in the Bible in the verse by the prophet Jeremiah as follows:
The key is to limit man’s power, not expand it. As the framers generally intended in fact, the smaller and less intrusive the government; the more limits it has; the more freedom and opportunity we end up with.
For as Thomas Jefferson put it:
Technology Industry as an Example
Technology is a market with little regulation and significant competition. Of all of the markets, it perhaps is the best example of a free market in operation. I don’t have to give you examples of how that has helped the consumer.
Now some will claim that Apple and others have transferred production elsewhere how is that helpful to the American consumer? To answer that fully we need to look at another debate comment by Hillary in more depth- “Chinese steel” and unpack that to see how deceptive that characterization is.
In the end however, the American consumer has gotten better products at lower prices. The technology keeps getting better and better giving you more for your money.
Capitalism, not Socialism btw.
Trump Frittered Away His Chance
Donald with the actual facts could have nailed slippery Hillary to the cross. Instead, he blew it and let her get away with more spin into yet another lie.
He took the bait and went down the red herring path Hillary threw out talking about how she used Russia to pivot away from the point. However, he then let the talks slip into a debate about his relationship with Putin.
He should have stayed on point and pressed Hillary on her actual statement. He didn’t.
As a skilled liar and lifetime politician, Hillary knows how to obfuscate and deflect. She’s done it all her political life.
This will not change an iota if she is elected. Her success in life is based upon this model. She is a strongly entrenched globalist and inveterate fraud.
Would you rather have a skilled liar with the intention of furthering her dream of a border-less New World Order?
Would you rather have a politically clumsy businessman with the intention of making America great again?
With Hillary, the Wiki Leaks revelations and Project Veritas investigation videos, have pulled away the curtain and demonstrated her to be the deceptive fraud she has always been. Lying to the public with a well-practiced, Cheshire cat smile that she plasters on at a moment’s notice.
Personally, I’m not happy about either of the choices. Nevertheless, I think I’ll take my chances with the clumsy businessman.
You want Hillary? Like Pontius Pilate, I wash my hands of this matter. Good luck. She will not be my President.
Meanwhile, I suggest you pray and stock up on ammo and food just in case. It may not help but like chicken soup, it couldn’t hurt