US Needs to Leave NATO Not Affirm It as Theresa May Stated in Philadelphia

UK Prime Minister Theresa May affirmed the commitment to NATO on Friday during her joint US-UK press appearance with President Trump in Philadelphia with the following comments:

On defense and security cooperation, we are united in our recognition of NATO as the bulwark of our collective defense. Today we’ve reaffirmed our unshakeable commitment to this alliance. Mr. President I think you said, confirmed that you are 100% behind NATO. But we’re also discussing the importance of NATO continuing to insure it is as equipped to fight terrorism and cyber warfare as it is to fight more conventional forms of war.

And I’ve agreed to continue my efforts to encourage my fellow European leaders to deliver on their commitments to spend 2% of their GDP on defense so that the burden is more fairly shared. It is only by investing properly in our defense that we can insure that we are properly equipped to face our shared challenges together.

Now some may applaud and many more will ignore this commitment as though it were necessary to fight radical Islamic terrorism. I believe that it is not only unnecessary but a danger to our nation as well.

NATO- Undermines Our Constitution

NATO, as the charter clearly demonstrates, is essentially an arm of the UN. As stated in the charter “The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations….” and Article 1:

NATO Charter - Article 1
The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
And Article 12:

NATO Charter - Article 12
After the Treaty has been in force for ten years, or at any time thereafter, the Parties shall, if any of them so requests, consult together for the purpose of reviewing the Treaty, having regard for the factors then affecting peace and security in the North Atlantic area, including the development of universal as well as regional arrangements under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security.

What is clear from the above excerpts and other references in the NATO charter is that when any of our troops are placed under the authority of NATO, they are fighting under the authority and control of the UN NOT under the authority of the US Constitution as required by Article 1- Section 8.

Not only is this not in accord with the provisions of our Constitution, which requires a declaration of war in Article 1, Section 8 but also requires in Article 2, Section 2 that “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;”

NATO – A Danger to Our Troops

Troops placed under NATO allows the UN to have a hand in how our troops are used taking control away from our Commander in Chief.  Now, the banksters like it because it guarantees continuation of wars with no clear victory and the continuation of the generation of massive debt- our Achilles heel.

However, it places our troops in the very danger that Donald Trump wishes to avoid which is that of broadcasting our military strategies to the enemy giving advance warning of our moves.

As noted by former veterans of the Korean war, the UN was made aware of our military moves because we were required to notify the UN in advance of every action we planned. This in turn was passed on to the enemy through the UN Under-Secretary for Security and Political Affairs, a post held by a Soviet General even through the war in Vietnam.

After MacArthur used his military knowledge and conducted the highly successful Inchon attack, he was relieved of his command by an incensed President Truman (A 33rd degree Mason btw. Just saying.). How dare he violate the UN rules of engagement and actually attempt to save U.S, lives and win the war.

These UN inspired  “rules of engagement” have been well acknowledged to ham string our troops and its commanders. Prior to our engagement with the UN, wars were fought with the objective of winning, not as a blood sport governed by restrictions as though it were part of the Hunger Games or something.

How Helpful is NATO

The fact is, every war we have fought since WWII has been under the aegis of the UN.  None have resulted in a clearly defined victory, beginning from Korea. War continues in all of those nations except Vietnam from which we withdrew and a Communist inspired government now controls.

We continue in NATO because that is what the globalists and international banking cartels want. It helps them, not the nations and people fighting the wars.

The nations continue to generate debt- the lifeblood of a central banking system such as we have in the private banking cartel euphemistically called the Federal Reserve and now globally as in the EU and all other nations banking systems.

It serves to undermine the economic systems of the strongest nations just as it has historically done to all empires from even before Rome and Greece. With the globalist visionary, once a nation collapses it will be easier to fold it into the New World Order with the UN as the template for a one world government.

UN Represents Human Rights Council Harbors Human Rights Violating Nations

After the October 2016 election of the UN Human Rights Council, more than half of the regimes sitting on the Council could be categorized as oppressive. One could see how disingenuous it is to call a global body ostensibly tasked with upholding the UN’s vision of human rights as genuine.

Among the latest selections to serve on the discredited global council are some of the most oppressive and murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships on the planet. That is despite the UN outfit’s mandate saying that only member governments that “uphold the highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights” are eligible to join. A farce as much of the UN’s claims turn out to be.

Withdraw From NATO Not Reinforce It

Unless we totally withdraw from NATO, we will be bled to financial death under the authority UN as the wars drag on draining our economic strength, ultimately leading to the elites precious New World Order.

I don’t want Donald Trump to allow a UN foot in the door to continue to have a direct input into our troops operations. It has harmed our troops and nation in the past. There is no reason to believe that it is not doing so today as well.

As I have done in the past, I strongly suggest that he get us out of NATO as quickly as possible. Unless we do. I believe nothing will really move forward in our ending this over decade long “war on terrorism”.

Continued NATO involvement will keep us as a fly caught in their trap waiting for the UN spider to consume us. It is high time for the best interests of this nation smothered in debt that we cut off one of the single biggest debt producers, foreign wars, by winning them, withdrawing from these costly engagements and spending less but doing more to directly benefit our citizens and our borders here.

Tags: , , , ,
Previous Post

San Francisco Claims It Offers Free Education – But How Free Is It?

Next Post

Clinton Global Initiative Closing Down

Leave a Reply