San Bernardino Shooting– 14 Americans dead, 16 injured. The immediate response of President Obama -more gun control. However, let’s be careful about labeling this a terrorist act or identifying Islamic terrorist connections.
Why so careful about the connection to so-called radical Islam but so quick to jump on the gun control bandwagon?
It’s pretty clear now that Obama, favors gun control over acts of terror. He uses every single case of a shooting to highlight the need for more gun control.
However, as pointed out in the well-researched book- Death By Gun Control, all genocides were preceded by the restriction of legal citizen gun ownership.
Fact is, one of the best ways for a State to be free to impose tyranny is to disarm the population. Marxist and tyrannical regimes always push for gun control in the lead up to the imposition of tyranny.
Paris has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world. Heck even the police cannot carry weapons in Paris. How did that work out for the people killed over there?
Seven shooters killed or injured over 500 people in about 30 minutes (an average of 70 slain per shooter). In fact, because there was absolutely no opposition, they calmly reloaded 3 or 4 times to shoot people lying on the floor of the movie theater. No guns. No way to protect themselves. This is safer for the population?
Another overlooked fact, the sites often chosen for mass killings are invariably “gun free” zones?
Doesn’t this suggest a discernible pattern of behavior on the part of the mass killers?
Once again, in San Bernardino, the failure of gun control raised its ugly head.
Not mentioned in the media narrative, the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California, the site of the recent massacre of innocents by a husband and wife, is another gun-free zone.
This is never really highlighted by the media however. Instead, Obama’s gun control comments become the lead.
The media selectively avoids mentioning the obvious fact that this shooting was conducted in a “gun-free” zone?
They also fail to mention and completely ignore the connection between mass shootings and psychotropic drugs over the past 20 years.
Instead the focus is on the weapon used, not the connection between psychotropic drugs, gun free zones and/or Islamic terrorism
It doesn’t take a great deal of research to suggest a connection between advertiser revenues in the media from psychotropic drugs and its failure to be noted in mass killers.
According to the National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM Foundation) in their year 2000 study (the latest they have on the issue on their site):
I don’t believe it is a stretch to conclude that the media will not bite the hand that feeds it. Since this study was done, it is apparent that Big Pharma ads on TV Big Pharma have grown significantly. And if anything remains a free zone, it is the mention of the connection between psychotropic drugs and mass shootings.
As pointed out on the home page, there is a massive monopolization of the media by Corporations. So it stands to reason that if you work for them and wish to remain employed, the spin you choose to apply will be that approved by those who pay you, the owners or controllers of the media.
Do the owners have an agenda then? Of course, they do.
One doesn’t have to do copious research to discern the globalization agenda. We have been conditioned to accept as fact, the necessity of the United States to be fighting wars on foreign soils for decades now on the other side of the planet.
As noted before in this blog, the Navy was running commercials ending with the catch phrase, America’s Navy, A Global Force for Good. The assumption being that we are the policeman of the planet. The result which remains however, is continuously more debt for our citizens serving global needs.
Is there an unstated agenda in the media reporting and the government push for legal citizen gun control?
Honest answers to the above questions lead us away from what the media would have us assume.
While our military is being used by the UN under NATO to fight foreign wars, the UN is pushing for global gun control. However, the UN (as their statue confirms) and all government’s (including ours) emphasis is on the control of weapons used for civilian protection.
Ignored is the fact that the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council are also the 5 largest arms dealers in the world. Is anyone in the media or government talking about controlling the military?
A proposed new world order which calls for a one world government can only be enforced under a tyrannical reign. Communist run countries are a model where authority controls the people under the tyranny of a police state. Gun control is always an objective in these nations.
There is a human cost for disarmament as confirmed in the book Death by Gun Control by Aaron Zelman and Richard W. Stevens.
Curiously however, it is now out of print with high prices for used editions on Amazon. Makes me wonder why? Does it perhaps strike too many nerves?
Personally, I think the evidence points to the conclusion that gun control is not really aimed at control of citizen weapons but rather control of the citizens themselves. As statistically validated in Death by Gun Control, all genocides are proceeded by citizen disarmament as documented in Nazi Germany, Rwanda, China, Cambodia, Russia, Turkey and others.
Is this what we want here? Guns don’t load, aim and fire themselves. People do.
Seems to me there are an awful lot of questions on this issue that are going unexplained and unexamined. Drowned out by the incessant drone of leftist politicians I guess.
Three Boxes to Preserve Liberty and Resist Tyranny – Plus One More
YouTube/Google Censorship of Pro 2nd Amendment Videos
Know What’s Being Left Out of the El Paso Narrative? Might Help If You Did
Frustrated Colorado STEM Charter School Students Walk Out of Shooting Vigil
Acid Attacks in the UK Average About 15 a Week. Another Progressive Agenda Success?
NJ Passes 6 Gun Control Laws That Hearken Back to Memories of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union
The Virginia Congressman Shooting- More Gun Control or Not?
Obama Tramples Upon the Constitution, Yet Again