Assign a 'primary' menu

Is Blasey Ford Really the Tearful Ditzy Blonde She Appeared to Be?

By Terry | Abortion

Christine Blasey Ford- high school picture

As I watched her testimony, I wondered how a professor with a PhD. in psychology could come across as so ditzy and tearfully fragile. Her voice at times could hardly be heard, it seemed. I kind of expected a PhD professor to be a bit more forceful and mature sounding in expression than the wounded victim I was hearing here. Seemed a tad overplayed to me.

She couldn’t figure out simple things like “I didn’t know how to let the committee know about Brett Kavanaugh.” But with help from her “beach friends” was pointed towards her local Congressional Representative.

Really? A woman with a doctorate needed friends to help her figure that out? Seemed like a bit of an act to me. The fragile wounded victim despite 36 years of distance on the event in question. Just the skeptic in me, but I wondered.

Wasn’t this lady a PhD professor with 2 Masters degrees? Wouldn’t that qualify her as pretty smart? Why the naivete when asked about payment for her legal services:

Rachel Mitchell: “Is it your understanding that someone else is going to assist you with these fees, including the costs for your polygraph?”

Ford responded with, “I’m aware that there’s been several “Go Fund Me” sites that I haven’t had a chance to figure out how to manage those because I’ve never had one.”

Rachel Mitchell: And I’m sorry, several what?

Ford: “Go Fund Me sites that have raised money primarily for our security detail. So, I’m not sure how to collect that money or how to distribute it yet. I haven’t been able to focus on that.”

Sounds a bit like like Hillary’s “What? You mean with a cloth?” to the question of whether she had wiped her hard drive with the program “Bleach Bit”. Yeah, dumb like a fox- it appears.

BTW, the sites have produced over $1, 000,000 to date I understand. Blasey-Ford claims it was for her alleged death threat security. Her security is being paid that much? Why did Dan Bongino ever leave the service?

I’m wondering who gets all that money? Did it really come from individual donors or was it perhaps chunked in there from vested interests like George Soros perhaps? At any rate, it’s an issue gone silent since a few days after the testimony. A payoff for services rendered perchance? Who knows but the ditzy blonde.

The Psychologist Lie

One sentence into her testimony Blasey-Ford said, “I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.” The problem with this statement is that for one to identify themselves as a psychologist in California, they have to be licensed. Turns out- Blasey Ford is not.

According to a California Department of Consumer Affairs records search, Blasey Ford is not licensed as a psychologist in the state of California, or anywhere else for  that matter.  YouBlasey Ford- Not a Psychologist can prove this yourself by selecting this link and putting in the name of Christine Ford or any combination thereof. Select psychologist in the license field to narrow the search more quickly.

Even if she had been licensed at one time and let it expire, she would be able to call herself a psychologist. She would just be forbidden to practice psychology on patients until the license was renewed. However, the database doesn’t even show expired licenses for Ford.

An InfoWars article, confirms that other potential states, such as Hawaii where Ford completed an internship, were also tried but again yielded no results. As InfoWars notes:

What makes Ford’s claim even more suspicious is someone affiliated with Stanford University appears to have also been aware of the potentially damning use of the word “psychologist” and rushed to cover for Ford.

DANGEROUS exclusively uncovered an archived version of Christine’s Blasey’s page on the school’s faculty directory. On September 10, 2015, the only archived date available, Ford’s faculty page was saved to the Wayback Machine and showed Ford listed as a “research psychologist” along with her email address and office phone number.

The most recent version of that page shows Ford listed only as an “Affiliate” in the department, with the words “research psychologist” removed along with Ford’s email address and phone number. This suggests the page was altered by someone very recently to scrub Ford’s contact information and title after she entered the national spotlight.

It is common for academics and researchers in psychology to not hold a license. That is permitted in California, as long as these people do not describe themselves as psychologists as Blasey Ford did. None of her unlicensed faculty members, including department chair Laura Roberts, describe themselves that way- only Blasey Ford.

Her adoption of the title not only misled the committee, but also violated California laws. As we will note below, Ford’s academic focus has been on biostatistics, not memory or trauma as one of her reply’s to Rachel Mitchell seemed to imply. The leftstream media, of course, praised her expertise as a “psychologist” except- she’s actually not.

This would qualify as a perjury charge to the committee btw which carries up to 5 years in federal prison. I suppose we could qualify Ford’s testimony then- as not getting off to a good start, from a trust and truth based perspective that is.

The Fear of Flying Lie

One of the first hints of something a bit amiss here was the fear of flying excuse, which turned out to be a lie. See the exchange with Rachel Mitchell on this issue in the video below:

Ford couldn’t attend the committee hearing right away, she claimed, because she had a fear of flying. Kind of a claustrophobic reaction to her trauma, it was hinted.

However, as the questioning attorney, Rachel Mitchell, revealed – she flies across the country to her family in Delaware at least once a year each summer. She also confirmed “surf travel” to Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific Islands and French Polynesia and to the Hawaiian Islands  and Tahiti for her listed interests. She also travels by plane as well for her work.

Her excuse at the end of the exchange was: “Easier for me to travel in that direction when its a vacation.

Yeah, sounds real plausible. Had Mitchell more experience as a cross examiner, this likely would have been followed up on more aggressively with questions on why the excuse to the first meeting request when she, in fact, does fly quite long distances without issues. Unfortunately, the non-defense attorney just let it go as just another question asked and answered.

Additionally, to this point, she wasn’t in California when the Committee offered to come to her. At it turns out, she was in Delaware visiting her family and then in Connecticut visiting friends. The Committee could easily have met with her in either location to take a statement. Another deception Blasey-Ford was never pressed on.

Emotional Aspects and Need for Time

Let me speculate here that perhaps Blasey Ford had some “scrubbing” of her own to do on her online background that needed to be attended to before meeting with the Senate? A duty which required a bit of time to be done thoroughly prior to her public appearance.

I also personally believe that she needed to buy some time as well to prepare her presentation before the committee. Please watch the 24 minute body language video below to confirm why I might have those suspicions. One thing of note, while Blasey Ford sounded tearful during the entire presentation, a technique covered in the body language video below, there was never a tear shed. I submit there was the appearance of emotion without the actual evidence of it.

On the other hand, the emotion coming from Brett Kavanaugh was quite clearly evidential and real. People who listened to his testimony were moved emotionally. Some in the audience behind him actually shedding tears. I didn’t get that at all from Blasey Ford. Her emotion appeared confined to her alone and not heart felt as Brett’s.

Additionally, the anger felt and expressed by Brett Kavanaugh was tangible as well. While the Dems, who have turned this into an intentional circus of delay, have used it against him- most people without an axe to grind understand fully why it was there. Quite frankly, many of us both expected  and welcomed it.

I also wonder if Blasey Ford’s visit to mom and dad may have been not only to accomplish a bit of background scrubbing, but some performance practice time as well.

Additionally, just who was it that she was visiting in Connecticut- and for what reason? Speculations begin to arise in my mind, as more facts are uncovered about Blasey Ford’s background. Facts, which we were never supplied with before the hearing or even afterwards by the media and certainly by no Dem.

[youtube_advanced url=”″ controls=”no” rel=”no” theme=”light”][/youtube_advanced]

Info Scrubbing

Natural News Reported:

Before going public with her baseless accusations against Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey scrubbed her internet history, removing her Linked In pages and even managing to have her entire high school year book completely removed from the internet.

(Natural News has now posted the recovered yearbook files now in pdf format at this link.)

She wasn’t such an innocent ditz apparently during high school however.

Blasey High School Days

Info Wars published an article with information gleaned about Blasey Ford’s highDrink It Up school environment during her school days:

Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks, are filled with references to drunken promiscuous parties where the attendees were not able to remember what happened.

However, on September 17, they seem to have been scrubbed from the Internet.

Passages in the yearbook reveal an environment of excessive drinking and promiscuity:

Lastly one cannot fail to mention the climax of the junior social scene, the party, reads one passage.

Striving to extend our educational experience beyond the confines of the classroom, we played such intellectually stimulating games as Quarters, Mexican Dice and everyone’s favorite, Pass-Out, which usually resulted from the aforementioned two.

Another passage emphasizes how “loss of consciousness” at such parties meant that attendees only retained hazy memories of them.

And there were always parties to celebrate any occasion,” reads one passage.

Although these parties are no doubt unforgettable, they are only a memory lapse for most, since loss of consciousness is often an integral part of the party scene.

Several passages discuss drunken keg parties while parents were away.

Cast parties, prom parties, post-game parties, pool parties, slumber parties, senior only parties, junior only parties – wherever you looked there were parties, states one yearbook from 1982.

Another passages emphasizes how promiscuous the girls were in their “choice of men.

No longer confining ourselves to the walls of Landon and Prep, we plunged into the waters of St. John and Gonzaga with much success.

Another entry makes reference to the “boys, beer and “the ‘Zoo’ atmosphere,”

There is more which you can read in the Info Wars article. This is the high school atmosphere that surrounded the tearful Miss Ford during her high school days.

Meanwhile, the Democrats attacked with fervor the entries in Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbook which were far more tame than the atmosphere in Blasey Ford’s high school.

Why is no attention being paid to these yearbooks which were eliminated from the internet on the 17th of September? This ditzy blonde attended a school of debauchery and I suspect that there is more to her high school days than the accusations leveled at Brett Kavanaugh.

Big Pharma Connection?

In addition to the questionable, high school days atmosphere, there may be some connections to the pharmaceutical industry. Natural News reported that Blasey Ford turns out to have ties to an abortion pill pharmaceutical company called Corcept Therapeutics for whom she worked as a director of biostatistics for 6 years from 2006 to 2012- maybe longer since it was cited in her 2015 bio for Palo Alto University as part of a “20 year” background in both academia and the biotech industry.

Apparently there are connections of Blasey Ford with a drug called mifepristoneAbortion drug- misoprostol manufactured by Corcept Therapeutics which when used with another drug called misoprostol is 95% effective in inducing abortions in the first 50 days.

Politifact calls Natural News claim “pants on fire” which in their arbitrary realm of ratings means a big lie. However, they only focus on one point. A point which was acknowledged in the Natural News story. There is more to the Natural News report than politifact covers if you actually take the time to read the Natural News article which discusses the issue in a lot more detail.

But again there is more to this story than meets the eye as well.

Natural News discovered that Blasey Ford is not just a psychology professor. In a link to a 2015 Palo Alto University yearbook Blasey Ford on page 191 it states:

Christine Blasey, Ph.D.

Dr. Blasey earned a Ph.D. in Counseling Psychology from the University of
Southern California and completed her dissertation in the laboratory of Dr.
Gayla Margolin, working on the Family Studies Project. Her dissertation was the
development of a new measure to assess coping among young children. Since
that time, she has worked for 20 years as Research Psychologist and
Biostatistician both in academia (Stanford University Department of Psychiatry) and in the biotech industry (Director of Biostatistics, Corcept Therapeutics). At Stanford, she was formally mentored and supervised by Dr. Helena Kraemer. In industry, she gained experience conducting statistical analyses within a regulatory environment, collaborating with statisticians from the FDA, and presenting annually at their Statistics in Industry conference. Dr. Blasey has served as a statistical reviewer for several journals in psychiatry and psychology. In 2009, Dr. Blasey earned an MS in Epidemiology with specialization in Biostatistics from the Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Health Research and Policy. She has previously taught statistics, research methods, and psychometrics courses at Pepperdine University and Stanford, and currently teaches the Statistics and Psychometrics sequence at PAU.

Why was there no mention of Christine Blasey Ford’s connection to the biotech industry and her connection to Corcept Therapeutics? The media and Democrats have portrayed her as only a psychology professor. What about her biotech background which leads to the abortion drug? I think we can figure out the answer to that question for ourselves.

Body Language Analysis

Please watch this video which provides an excellent body language analysis of Christine Blasey Ford. As the analyzer notes, pretty pose as she calls it (a way of Ford making herself appear childlike, vulnerable and thus more believable) was employed by Ford throughout the hearing as a technique to convince her audience.

I must admit, it worked very well indeed- until you probe a bit deeper into who Blasey Ford actually is. As I am forced to conclude after further research into Blasey Ford myself, this analyzer also concludes that Ford’s performance was an act from start to finish:

[youtube_advanced url=”” controls=”no” rel=”no” theme=”light”][/youtube_advanced]

So, Blasey Ford waltz’s into Washington and plays this tearful, wounded, ditzy role with her fragile-voiced answers. However, this wounded woman has also been funded in numerous studies, all related to the abortion drug mentioned above- mifepristone.

Mifepristone described here is indicated as a drug to be used to “end an early pregnancy”:

Why is Mifepristone Prescribed? (Indications)

This medication is a synthetic steroid, used alone or together with another medication, to end an early pregnancy (within 7 weeks of the start of a woman’s last menstrual period). It blocks the hormone needed for pregnancy to continue. It is also indicated for high blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia) in adults with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome.

The other medication mentioned earlier is misoprostol which has indications for: “labor induction, induced abortion, miscarriage” The combination of these apparently provides a one-two punch to induce labor and clear the womb of its contents, aka an abortion.

This lends more credence to the Natural News report of how this drug interacts with mifepristone, the drug marketed by the biotech firm which employed Blasey Ford for 6 years.

Bringing It All Together

What the Natural News article concludes is that Blasey Ford has more motivation to make sexual abuse allegations against Brett Kavanaugh than simply her bias as a liberal Democrat. Blasey Ford’s multi-million dollar company’s only drug is the abortion inducing mifepristone. It is their bread and butter medication.

It would be interesting to see if Blasey Ford has any financial interests in this firm. That would certainly explain a great deal one would think.

As Natural News notes however:

Brett Kavanaugh is widely feared by Democrats because they believe he may be a pivotal decision maker that could theoretically overturn Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

Having Kavanaugh on the court is a definitive threat to the Democrat’s dedication to the preservation of legalized abortion.

However, if abortion is restricted, a firm like the one Blasey-Ford worked for stands to lose many millions- maybe even be forced to close. This, of course, may put a potential dent in the lifestyle of the jet setting Ms. Ford with her flights to the islands for vacation surfing and to pursue her interests in the Hawaiian Islands and Tahitian culture.

As the Natural News puts it, Blasey Ford has not only an ideological but also a financial motivation to keep Brett Kavanaugh off of the Supreme Court.

The Democrats have a political motivation as they want to continue to push their Marxist laced take over of the American public with their leftist “progressive” ideas. (Progressive as noted by David Horowitz in his Black Book of the American Left is simply a euphemism for Marxism.)

The two parties of Ford and the Dems met happily somewhere in the middle and Blasey Ford played her role to the hilt.

As noted in the opening of this post, the ditzy, tearful Ms. Blasey Ford is obviously not as ditzy, tearful, nor as clueless as she played to the audience during her media and politician labeled “credible” testimony.

It also appears that the high school Ford attended at the time of the alleged event was significantly laced with more drinking and sex than Brett Kavanaughs’s school. This would again point to a faux innocence on the part of Ms. Blasey Ford than one would assume from her performance (which while it sounded tearful actually yielded not a one btw).

Yes, she may have been abused during high school, particularly in the school of debauchery which she attended it would appear. Had she been sexually assaulted, this would lend emotional credibility to her story which she could draw upon as she projected during the hearings. However, it could also be likely that Ms. Ford, lacking corroborating facts to back her allegations, was not assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge as she claims as well, or possibly anyone for that matter.

Additionally, carefully left out of her public profile is her connections to Corcept Therapeutics and mifepristone, the abortion drug, for which she has been associated with a half dozen  or more research papers.

These are important background factors that cast Ms. Blasey Ford in a far different light than the highly touted, damaged victim that the Democrats and the media have unceasingly portrayed her as.

If this becomes public knowledge, Ms. Ford will lose some of the charge of her current bravery-filled, victim heroine persona. For the sake of justice and the integrity of Brett Kavanaugh I, for one, would like to see it become public knowledge. The victim story, with no corroborating evidence, is beginning to wear a little thin, especially after Ms. Ford has been funded for over $1,000,000 in her – what do they call them? Oh yeah, Go Fund Me account.

Although Blasey Ford has said she did not come forward for political reasons nor has she been paid to come forward. Yet, there are 3 known Go Fund Me accounts totally over $1 Million as mentioned above. She has not stated that she intends to return the money, nor has she told anyone to not send money. Pretty good payday one would think.

For even more details on this story check out the Natural News article.