The accepted media and political narrative is that the UN is an organization dedicated to bringing about international peace for all. Of course, it is made to make the organization sound like an altruistic organization necessary for world peace, law and order.
However, with some objective research and observation one finds that all of the platitudes do not have the intent that we are led to believe they have.
One way to discern the disconnect in the political hype and the reality is to check out the words of the UN itself. A good starting point is the UN Charter. Examined in a little bit of detail we can begin to get some clues as to what this “peace keeping” organization is really about.
The UN Charter is a document which you can easily find online. It begins with wonderful sounding intentions. In the first 2 articles of the UN Charter, the words “peace” or “peaceful” are used 7 times alone:
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
Sounds pretty peaceful huh? But does it stay that way? Let’s take a little deeper dive into the charter.
In article 23 we are introduced to the Security Council and its 5 permanent members
The 5 permanent members have veto power over any decisions of the council which makes them a very powerful set of nations in the UN peacekeeping hierarchy. However here where things get a little dodgy, as they say in Britain.
The 5 permanent members of the Security Council are also the 5 largest arms producing nations in the world.
Two of them represent nations which operate under Communist tyrannies regardless of what they claim. Nations which have a track record for being the two leading democide nations (Coined by R.J. Rummel in his book Death by Government). That of course would be China and Russia under Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Lenin et al.
Four of these five nations are also heavily influenced by Socialist style governments or are declared Socialist such as the aforementioned Communist nations. We (the U.S.) have been pushed in that direction at a growing pace since WWII.
But hey, not to worry, this is after all as UN Charter Articles 1 and 2 maintain all about peace right? The video below The UN Deception outlines how peace is defined and carried out by the peaceful UN in actuality:
[youtube_advanced url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIw4V6WIkyU” controls=”no” rel=”no” theme=”light”]
Apparently, as the video shows it is peace provided you do not breach a peace as defined by the UN.
If that happens, then Articles 41 and 42 from the Charter kick in and the game changes markedly.
In a closer examination of Articles 41 and 42 we are able to determine exactly who decides who and what defines peaceful.
Chapter VII- Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace and Acts of Aggression
The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. [texthighlight color=”red-vibrant” ]Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.[/texthighlight]
Once again- “0ther operations by air, sea or land forces of Members of the United Nations.” As it turns out the leading supplier of those air, sea or land forces is and, in fact, nearly all of their support forces is the United States as we have seen from our NATO involvement in the longest wars our nation has been involved in.
Unacknowledged in all of the reporting on these wars is that once the U.S. operates under NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), we are operating primarily under the authority of the United Nations, as is happening in Afghanistan and Iraq. Or perhaps as under SEATO (Southeastern Asia Treaty Organization) which placed our troops again under the United Nations authority in VietNam.
In part 2, we’ll take a look at some of the major conflicts under which the U.S. operated and their connections to the United Nations.
Some books on the UN that takes a peek behind the curtain provided by the sympathetic media and political class which presents a white washed version suitable as propaganda but not as a full picture:
What the CDC Would Rather You Not Know About COVID Tests, Categories, and Their Numbers
Destroying Clear Reason With the Plague of Pluralism
What Are the Real Purposes of The George Floyd Riots?
Completely Eliminated from the COVID-19 Panic – The Environment
The Gates Foundation Funds a New Microchip Vaccine Technology for COVID-19
Kissinger WSJ Op-ed: The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order
The Scientist, Whose Doomsday Coronavirus Report Incited a Global Panic, Just Walked His Mortality Predictions Back to 4% of His Original Prediction
COVID Hype and Dem Governor Tyranny Up – Mortality? Down