The party line is that the UN is an organization dedicated to bringing about international peace for all. Sounds wonderful doesn’t it.
However, with a little objective research and observation, one finds that it doesn’t quite work out that way.
The UN Charter is a 27 page document which you can easily find online with a google search.
It starts out sounding quite wonderful and in the first 2 articles mentions the words peace or peaceful 8 times:
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
Sounds pretty peaceful huh? The primary question that must be asked is whether this is actually true or not. Let’s delve into the charter a bit further.
In article 23 we are introduced to the Security Council and its 5 permanent members
The 5 permanent members have veto power over any decisions of the council BTW so they are pretty powerful in the UN peacekeeping hierarchy. However, here’s where things get a little dodgy as they say in Britain.
Is the UN Security Council really a guarantee of security?
The 5 Permanent Members of the UN Security Council are:
But hey, not to worry. This is after all, as UN Charter Articles 1 and 2 maintain, all about peace right? Watch the UN Deception below to see how peace is really defined and carried out by this allegedly peace based UN:
Peace alright, unless you breach a peace as defined by the UN. If your nation does according to the UN definitions and charter well then….Articles 41 and 42 kick in
After that- the game changes markedly.
Chapter VII- Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace and Acts of Aggression
The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
“0ther operations by air, sea or land forces of Members of the United Nations.” is, of course, the US who is the leading supplier of those air, sea or land forces is as well as nearly all of their support forces and materials? (Which is creating massive debt for the citizens of this nation.)
The UN based NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is used as the authority as in Afghanistan and Iraq. UN based SEATO (Southeastern Asia Treaty Organization) was used to place our troops under the UN in Vietnam from which came the “rules of engagement” which handcuffed us so that we lost that war. Not an accident.
Next, we’ll take a look at some of the major conflicts under which the U.S. operated and their connections to the United Nations.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.